Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Information Extraction over Structured Data: Question Answering with Freebase
2014282 citationsXuchen Yao, Benjamin Van Durmeprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Xuchen Yao's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xuchen Yao with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xuchen Yao more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xuchen Yao. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xuchen Yao. The network helps show where Xuchen Yao may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Xuchen Yao
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Xuchen Yao.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Xuchen Yao based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Xuchen Yao. Xuchen Yao is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Yao, Xuchen & Benjamin Van Durme. (2014). Information Extraction over Structured Data: Question Answering with Freebase. 956–966.282 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Yao, Xuchen. (2014). Feature-driven Question Answering With Natural Language Alignment.13 indexed citations
Yao, Xuchen, Benjamin Van Durme, Chris Callison-Burch, & Peter E. Clark. (2013). Answer Extraction as Sequence Tagging with Tree Edit Distance. North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 858–867.106 indexed citations
9.
Zhang, Chengzhi, Xuchen Yao, & Chunyu Kit. (2013). Finding More Bilingual Webpages with High Credibility via Link Analysis. CityU Scholars. 138–143.1 indexed citations
10.
Yao, Xuchen, Benjamin Van Durme, Chris Callison-Burch, & Peter E. Clark. (2013). A Lightweight and High Performance Monolingual Word Aligner. Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2. 702–707.27 indexed citations
11.
Yao, Xuchen, Benjamin Van Durme, & Peter E. Clark. (2013). Automatic Coupling of Answer Extraction and Information Retrieval. Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 159–165.10 indexed citations
Wolfe, Travis, Benjamin Van Durme, Mark Dredze, et al.. (2013). PARMA: A Predicate Argument Aligner. Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 63–68.9 indexed citations
Clark, Peter E., P.V. Harrison, & Xuchen Yao. (2012). An Entailment-Based Approach to the QA4MRE Challenge..3 indexed citations
17.
Yao, Xuchen, Benjamin Van Durme, & Chris Callison-Burch. (2012). Expectations of Word Sense in Parallel Corpora. 621–625.5 indexed citations
18.
Yao, Xuchen & Benjamin Van Durme. (2011). Nonparametric Bayesian word sense induction. 10–14.24 indexed citations
19.
Yao, Xuchen, et al.. (2010). PDTB XML: the XMLization of the Penn Discourse TreeBank 2.0. Language Resources and Evaluation.3 indexed citations
20.
Yao, Xuchen, et al.. (2010). Practical Evaluation of Speech Recognizers for Virtual Human Dialogue Systems. Language Resources and Evaluation.7 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.