Keith Alcock
About
In The Last Decade
Keith Alcock
3 papers receiving 362 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Artificial Intelligence 322
- Information Systems 111
- Molecular Biology 67
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 62
- Computer Networks and Communications 31
Countries citing papers authored by Keith Alcock
This map shows the geographic impact of Keith Alcock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith Alcock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith Alcock more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Keith Alcock
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith Alcock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith Alcock. The network helps show where Keith Alcock may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Keith Alcock
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Keith Alcock. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Keith Alcock based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Keith Alcock. Keith Alcock is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | Semantic distance in WordNet: An experimental, application-oriented evaluation of five measures | 407 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.