Xiaoxia Li
- Molecular Biology
- Pharmacology top 2%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Infectious Diseases top 10%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Topics
- Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (15 papers)Fungal Biology and Applications (9 papers)Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- ChinaUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Xiaoxia Li
83 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 167
- Molecular Biology 406
- Pharmacology 365
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 334
- Infectious Diseases 224
- Plant Science 199
Countries citing papers authored by Xiaoxia Li
This map shows the geographic impact of Xiaoxia Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xiaoxia Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xiaoxia Li more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Xiaoxia Li
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xiaoxia Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xiaoxia Li. The network helps show where Xiaoxia Li may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Xiaoxia Li
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Xiaoxia Li. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Xiaoxia Li based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Xiaoxia Li. Xiaoxia Li is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | Chemical constituents from Rwandan plant Rosmarinus officinalis L. (I). | 1 |
| 13 | 29 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 20 | |
| 17 | A new disecosteroid from an endolichenic fungal stain Sporormiella irregularis(No.71-11-4-1) | 4 |
| 18 | Overview of Pharmacological Research on Lepidium L. | 1 |
| 19 | Studies on biological characteristic of black rot in Dendrobium nobile of Chishui | 0 |
| 20 | Circulation Economy,the Inevitable Path of Agriculture Modernization of China | 1 |
About Xiaoxia Li
Xiaoxia Li is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Complementary and alternative medicine and Issues, ethics and legal aspects, having authored 91 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (15 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (9 papers) and Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (189 citations), Pharmacology (365 citations) and Modeling and Simulation (81 citations). Xiaoxia Li has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Hao Gao, Guo‐Dong Chen, Lifeng Han, Liang‐Dong Guo, Yongzhe Dong, Erwei Liu, Yi Zhang, Shiming Fang, Tao Wang and Lu Qu. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Food Chemistry and Free Radical Biology and Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.