Xiao-Ling Li

571 citations
33 papers · 487 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Xiao-Ling Li

32 papers receiving 484 citations

Peers

Xiao-Ling Li
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Inorganic Chemistry 292
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 213
  • Materials Chemistry 187
  • Oncology 99
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 32
Replace Xinfa Li with:
Xinfa Li China
Can Ji China
Qitao Liu China
Grainne Moran Australia
Weiyu Bi China
Yulan Song China
A. I. Nekhaev Russia
Christos Papadopoulos Greece
Shuxian Chen China
Sebastian Tiemeyer Germany
Xiao-Ling Li relative to Xinfa Li China Xinfa Li's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Xinfa Li · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Xiao-Ling Li

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Xiao-Ling Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xiao-Ling Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xiao-Ling Li more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Xiao-Ling Li

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xiao-Ling Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xiao-Ling Li. The network helps show where Xiao-Ling Li may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Xiao-Ling Li, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Xiao-Ling Li Line = papers co-authored together Xiao-Ling Li links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201182
2 201346
3 201339
4 200838
5 201131
6 201630
7 201028
8 201926
9 201426
10 201317
11 200514
12
3-D Discontinuity Orientations using Combined Optical Imaging and LiDAR Techniques
201113
13 200512
14
LiDAR and Optical Imaging for 3-D Fracture Orientations
201110
15 20089
16 20048
17 20078
18 20057
19 20147
20 20127

About Xiao-Ling Li

Xiao-Ling Li is a scholar working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Materials Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry, Oncology and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 33 papers that have together received 487 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (13 papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (12 papers), Metal complexes synthesis and properties (5 papers), Metal and Thin Film Mechanics (3 papers), 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage (3 papers), Nuclear and radioactivity studies (3 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (3 papers) and Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Inorganic Chemistry (292 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (213 citations), Materials Chemistry (187 citations), Oncology (99 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (32 citations). Xiao-Ling Li has collaborated with scholars based in China, Japan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Guang‐Zhen Liu, Li‐Ya Wang, Ling-Yun Xin, Shi-Hui Li, Zilu Chen, Fu‐Pei Liang, Ye Duan, Norbert H. Maerz, Yi‐Lei Zhao and Bing Zhao. Their work appears in journals such as CrystEngComm, Applied Spectroscopy, Journal of Solid State Chemistry, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science and Applied Surface Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact