Xiaolin Teng

476 citations
5 papers · 326 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

Xiaolin Teng

5 papers receiving 304 citations

Peers

Xiaolin Teng
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Software 223
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 187
  • Statistics and Probability 41
  • Atmospheric Science 79
  • Information Systems 89
Replace Max B. Mendel with:
Max B. Mendel United States
Alan Winterbottom United Kingdom
Thomas Fetz Austria
Giang V. Nguyen South Korea
Khalaf S. Sultan Saudi Arabia
Han Ming China
R. R. L. Kantam India
Aldo Corbellini Italy
Céline Helbert France
Jalmar M. F. Carrasco Brazil
Xiaolin Teng relative to Max B. Mendel United States Max B. Mendel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×44.5×
Max B. Mendel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Xiaolin Teng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Xiaolin Teng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xiaolin Teng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xiaolin Teng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Xiaolin Teng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xiaolin Teng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xiaolin Teng. The network helps show where Xiaolin Teng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Xiaolin Teng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Xiaolin Teng Line = papers co-authored together Xiaolin Teng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

5 of 5 papers shown
#Work
1 2003154
2 201791
3 200648
4 200232
5
A Software-Reliability Growth Model for -Version Programming Systems
20021

About Xiaolin Teng

Xiaolin Teng is a scholar working on Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Software, Computer Networks and Communications, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Atmospheric Science, having authored 5 papers that have together received 326 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reliability and Maintenance Optimization (4 papers), Software Reliability and Analysis Research (4 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (1 paper), Software System Performance and Reliability (1 paper), Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (1 paper), Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (1 paper), Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications (1 paper) and Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Software (223 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (187 citations), Statistics and Probability (41 citations), Atmospheric Science (79 citations) and Information Systems (89 citations). Xiaolin Teng has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Hoang Pham, Xuemei Zhang, Hoang Pham, Daniel R. Jeske, Xiaohong Yao, Huiwang Gao, Jiajia Qi, Huan Xie, Leiming Zhang and Qingjing Hu. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Reliability, IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics - Part A Systems and Humans and Environmental Science & Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact