Xiaoli Ni

34 papers receiving 639 citations

Peers

Xiaoli Ni
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Applied Psychology 65
  • Communication 80
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 22
  • Sociology and Political Science 384
  • Clinical Psychology 184
Replace Richard J. E. James with:
Richard J. E. James United Kingdom
Nancy Schwartz United States
Mohammad Farhan Al. Qudah Saudi Arabia
Giovanni Del Puente Italy
Ralf Thalemann Germany
Suliman S. Aljomaa Saudi Arabia
Ismael Salamah Albursan Saudi Arabia
Elfrid Krossbakken Norway
Emrah Emirtekin Türkiye
Cemal Onur Noyan Türkiye
Xiaoli Ni relative to Richard J. E. James United Kingdom Richard J. E. James's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Richard J. E. James · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Xiaoli Ni

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Xiaoli Ni's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xiaoli Ni with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xiaoli Ni more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Xiaoli Ni

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xiaoli Ni. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xiaoli Ni. The network helps show where Xiaoli Ni may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Xiaoli Ni, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Xiaoli Ni Line = papers co-authored together Xiaoli Ni links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009241
2 201863
3 202148
4 202038
5 202326
6 201925
7 202125
8 202019
9 202018
10 202216
11 202215
12 201915
13 202215
14 202114
15 201812
16 201711
17 202410
18 202110
19 20227
20 20217

About Xiaoli Ni

Xiaoli Ni is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Communication, Education, Clinical Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 38 papers that have together received 673 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Impact of Technology on Adolescents (16 papers), Social Media and Politics (10 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (8 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (3 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (2 papers) and Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (65 citations), Communication (80 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (22 citations), Sociology and Political Science (384 citations) and Clinical Psychology (184 citations). Xiaoli Ni has collaborated with scholars based in China, Malaysia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Hong Yan, Silu Chen, Zhengwen Liu, Gengfeng Niu, Yijun Luo, Yinbo Liu, Yuping Wang, Yuping Wang, Tingyu Mu and Xin Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Children and Youth Services Review, Frontiers in Plant Science and BMC Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact