Xiaocong Peng

31 papers receiving 425 citations

Peers

Xiaocong Peng
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Cancer Research 98
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 89
  • Computational Mechanics 107
  • Atmospheric Science 90
  • Plant Science 105
Replace Claire Laurent with:
Claire Laurent France
Shenyi Wang China
Atsushi Yoshioka Japan
Huihui Wu China
James L. Gardner United States
Fei Meng China
Yuming Dong China
Mary Jo Bernhard United States
Chang Lu China
Xiaocong Peng relative to Claire Laurent France Claire Laurent's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.3×
Claire Laurent · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Xiaocong Peng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Xiaocong Peng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xiaocong Peng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xiaocong Peng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Xiaocong Peng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xiaocong Peng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xiaocong Peng. The network helps show where Xiaocong Peng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Xiaocong Peng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Xiaocong Peng Line = papers co-authored together Xiaocong Peng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1988141
2 199455
3 202129
4 202025
5 201818
6 202217
7 202317
8 201513
9 202211
10 202311
11 202410
12 20239
13 20209
14 20218
15 20228
16 20248
17 20168
18 20237
19 20237
20 20186

About Xiaocong Peng

Xiaocong Peng is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Biomedical Engineering, Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, having authored 38 papers that have together received 452 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Laser Material Processing Techniques (16 papers), Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (15 papers), Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques (13 papers), Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (10 papers), Atmospheric aerosols and clouds (8 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (7 papers), Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (6 papers) and Nonlinear Optical Materials Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (98 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (89 citations), Computational Mechanics (107 citations), Atmospheric Science (90 citations) and Plant Science (105 citations). Xiaocong Peng has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Paul L. Skipper, Steven R. Tannenbaum, Liang‐Shang Gan, Gerald N. Wogan, John D. Groopman, Jianda Shao, Chaoyang Wei, Yuzhen Fu, Xinming Wang and Xinhui Bi. Their work appears in journals such as Optics Express, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Atmospheric chemistry and physics, Environmental Pollution and Optics & Laser Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact