Xiaocong Chen

42 papers receiving 987 citations

Peers

Xiaocong Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 136
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 220
  • Health Informatics 14
  • Biochemistry 59
  • Aquatic Science 55
  • Management Science and Operations Research 81
Replace Chen Lin with:
Chen Lin Taiwan
Amit Gupta India
Yixuan Fan China
Mayun Chen China
Tingting He China
Juntao Li China
Yuting Liu China
Johan Lim South Korea
Xiaocong Chen relative to Chen Lin Taiwan Chen Lin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.4×
Chen Lin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Xiaocong Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Xiaocong Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xiaocong Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xiaocong Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Xiaocong Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xiaocong Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xiaocong Chen. The network helps show where Xiaocong Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Xiaocong Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Xiaocong Chen Line = papers co-authored together Xiaocong Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2021128
2 200895
3 200792
4 202386
5 201175
6 200671
7 201466
8 201064
9 202232
10 202231
11 202226
12 202321
13 202120
14 202116
15 202315
16 202414
17 202213
18 202312
19 202112
20 202211

About Xiaocong Chen

Xiaocong Chen is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Operations Research, Information Systems, Molecular Biology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 47 papers that have together received 1000 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research (14 papers), Recommender Systems and Techniques (10 papers), Reinforcement Learning in Robotics (9 papers), Smart Grid Energy Management (6 papers), Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (5 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (4 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (3 papers) and Fungal Biology and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (220 citations), Health Informatics (14 citations), Biochemistry (59 citations), Aquatic Science (55 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (81 citations). Xiaocong Chen has collaborated with scholars based in China, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Laura E. Nagy, Lina Yao, Becky M. Sebastian, Xianzhi Wang, Jinming Dong, Yu Zhang, Tao Zhou, Donald W. Jacobsen, Hui Tang and Armend Axhemi. Their work appears in journals such as Phytochemistry, Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part D Genomics and Proteomics, ACM Transactions on Information Systems, Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology and Knowledge-Based Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact