Xi Tong
About
In The Last Decade
Xi Tong
7 papers receiving 343 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Clinical Psychology 220
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 119
- Cognitive Neuroscience 65
- Social Psychology 56
- Psychiatry and Mental health 47
Countries citing papers authored by Xi Tong
This map shows the geographic impact of Xi Tong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xi Tong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xi Tong more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Xi Tong
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xi Tong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xi Tong. The network helps show where Xi Tong may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Xi Tong
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Xi Tong. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Xi Tong based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Xi Tong. Xi Tong is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 136 | |
| 4 | The Chinese Version of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale,11th Version(BIS-11) in Adolescents: Its Reliability and Validity | 21 |
| 5 | 123 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 58 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.