Wudi Wang
About
In The Last Decade
Wudi Wang
3 papers receiving 977 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 923
- Materials Chemistry 698
- Condensed Matter Physics 344
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 126
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 40
Countries citing papers authored by Wudi Wang
This map shows the geographic impact of Wudi Wang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wudi Wang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wudi Wang more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Wudi Wang
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wudi Wang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wudi Wang. The network helps show where Wudi Wang may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wudi Wang
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wudi Wang. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wudi Wang based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Wudi Wang. Wudi Wang is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 59 | |
| 2 | 91 | |
| 3 | Evidence for the chiral anomaly in the Dirac semimetal Na 3 Bi breakdown → | 844 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.