Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The orienteering problem: A survey
2010667 citationsPieter Vansteenwegen, Wouter Souffriau et al.European Journal of Operational Researchprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Wouter Souffriau
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Wouter Souffriau's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wouter Souffriau with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wouter Souffriau more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Wouter Souffriau
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wouter Souffriau. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wouter Souffriau. The network helps show where Wouter Souffriau may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wouter Souffriau
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wouter Souffriau.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wouter Souffriau based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Wouter Souffriau. Wouter Souffriau is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Vansteenwegen, Pieter, Wouter Souffriau, Greet Vanden Berghe, & Dirk Van Oudheusden. (2010). The City Trip Planner: An expert system for tourists. Expert Systems with Applications. 38(6). 6540–6546.188 indexed citations
Vansteenwegen, Pieter, Wouter Souffriau, & Dirk Van Oudheusden. (2010). The orienteering problem: A survey. European Journal of Operational Research. 209(1). 1–10.667 indexed citations breakdown →
Vansteenwegen, Pieter, Wouter Souffriau, & Ander García. (2009). Personalized tourist guide: multi-constraint team orienteering problem with time windows. Lirias (KU Leuven). 76.2 indexed citations
Souffriau, Wouter, Pieter Vansteenwegen, Greet Vanden Berghe, & Dirk Van Oudheusden. (2008). Automated Parameterisation of a Metaheuristic for the Orienteering Problem. Adaptive and multilevel Metaheuristics. Lirias (KU Leuven).2 indexed citations
Souffriau, Wouter, Pieter Vansteenwegen, Greet Vanden Berghe, & Dirk Van Oudheusden. (2008). Solving the aircraft weight and balance problem by exact and heuristic algorithms.1 indexed citations
Vansteenwegen, Pieter, Wouter Souffriau, & Dirk Van Oudheusden. (2007). Personalized Mobile Tourist Guide: Guided Local Search for the Team Orienteering Problem. 25–29.1 indexed citations
19.
Souffriau, Wouter, Pieter Vansteenwegen, Greet Vanden Berghe, & Dirk Van Oudheusden. (2006). Multi-Level Metaheuristics for the Orienteering Problem. 1–5.3 indexed citations
20.
Souffriau, Wouter, Pieter Vansteenwegen, & Dirk Van Oudheusden. (2006). Developing an electronic tourist guide: the automated planning of touristic trips.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.