Wouter Schakel
Impact in
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Gender Politics and Representation
-
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Policy and Reform Studies
- Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Papers in
-
- Gender Politics and Representation 7
-
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation 12
- Social Policy and Reform Studies 8
- Populism, Right-Wing Movements 4
- Policy Transfer and Learning 2
- Co-authors
- Armèn HakhverdianBrian BurgoonDaphne van der PasMikael PerssonJonas PontussonAnders SundellNoam LupuThomas Zittel
- Journals
- European Journal of Political Research (5 papers)Socio-Economic Review (2 papers)Politics & Society (1 paper)Acta Politica (1 paper)International Political Science Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsSwedenGermany
In The Last Decade
Wouter Schakel
13 papers receiving 262 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Gender Studies 108
- Political Science and International Relations 231
- Communication 27
- Public Administration 9
- Strategy and Management 33
Countries citing papers authored by Wouter Schakel
This map shows the geographic impact of Wouter Schakel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wouter Schakel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wouter Schakel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Wouter Schakel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wouter Schakel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wouter Schakel. The network helps show where Wouter Schakel may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 12 scholars most cited alongside Wouter Schakel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 13 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 40 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 34 | |
| 12 | Representing the rich: Economic and political inequality in established democracies | 2020 | 1 |
| 13 | 2019 | 91 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 47 |
About Wouter Schakel
Wouter Schakel is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration, Strategy and Management and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 14 papers that have together received 275 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (12 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (8 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (7 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (4 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (4 papers), Policy Transfer and Learning (2 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (1 paper) and Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (108 citations), Political Science and International Relations (231 citations), Communication (27 citations), Public Administration (9 citations) and Strategy and Management (33 citations). Wouter Schakel has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Sweden and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Armèn Hakhverdian, Brian Burgoon, Daphne van der Pas, Mikael Persson, Jonas Pontusson, Anders Sundell, Noam Lupu, Thomas Zittel, Tom Louwerse and Helene Helboe Pedersen. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Political Research, Socio-Economic Review, Politics & Society, Acta Politica and International Political Science Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.