Wouter Kruijne

673 total citations
23 papers, 427 citations indexed

About

Wouter Kruijne is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Wouter Kruijne has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 427 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 5 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 4 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Wouter Kruijne's work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (14 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (10 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (10 papers). Wouter Kruijne is often cited by papers focused on Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (14 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (10 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (10 papers). Wouter Kruijne collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and Slovakia. Wouter Kruijne's co-authors include Martijn Meeter, Sander A. Los, Hedderik van Rijn, John K. Tsotsos, Christian N. L. Olivers, Mieke Donk, Nicola Anderson, Zhiguo Wang, Jan Theeuwes and Pieter R. Roelfsema and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, NeuroImage and Psychological Review.

In The Last Decade

Wouter Kruijne

23 papers receiving 422 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Wouter Kruijne Netherlands 13 384 110 60 44 40 23 427
Bo-Yeong Won United States 12 448 1.2× 99 0.9× 72 1.2× 36 0.8× 21 0.5× 25 491
Simona Buetti United States 15 458 1.2× 144 1.3× 106 1.8× 102 2.3× 38 0.9× 48 539
Fabiano Botta Spain 11 421 1.1× 166 1.5× 29 0.5× 60 1.4× 26 0.7× 35 526
Marcus R. Watson Canada 12 234 0.6× 160 1.5× 38 0.6× 81 1.8× 97 2.4× 22 427
Markus Conci Germany 21 934 2.4× 195 1.8× 125 2.1× 92 2.1× 38 0.9× 64 1.0k
Benchi Wang Netherlands 16 982 2.6× 205 1.9× 69 1.1× 91 2.1× 47 1.2× 27 1.0k
Jaap Munneke Netherlands 12 456 1.2× 104 0.9× 38 0.6× 49 1.1× 11 0.3× 23 510
Dirk van Moorselaar Netherlands 16 971 2.5× 201 1.8× 37 0.6× 126 2.9× 43 1.1× 50 1.1k
Lina Skora United Kingdom 9 212 0.6× 158 1.4× 47 0.8× 84 1.9× 16 0.4× 13 343
Michi Matsukura United States 13 636 1.7× 122 1.1× 72 1.2× 110 2.5× 15 0.4× 19 657

Countries citing papers authored by Wouter Kruijne

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wouter Kruijne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wouter Kruijne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wouter Kruijne more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wouter Kruijne

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wouter Kruijne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wouter Kruijne. The network helps show where Wouter Kruijne may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wouter Kruijne

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wouter Kruijne. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wouter Kruijne based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Wouter Kruijne. Wouter Kruijne is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Mathôt, Sebastiaan, et al.. (2024). Effects of Pupil Size as Manipulated through ipRGC Activation on Visual Processing. Journal of Vision. 24(10). 601–601. 1 indexed citations
2.
Mathôt, Sebastiaan, et al.. (2023). Effects of pupil size as manipulated through ipRGC activation on visual processing. NeuroImage. 283. 120420–120420. 7 indexed citations
3.
Schlichting, Nadine, et al.. (2022). Addendum: Implicit learning of temporal behavior in complex dynamic environments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 29(6). 2325–2329. 1 indexed citations
4.
Kruijne, Wouter, Christian N. L. Olivers, & Hedderik van Rijn. (2021). Memory for Stimulus Duration Is Not Bound to Spatial Information. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 33(7). 1211–1229. 1 indexed citations
5.
Kruijne, Wouter, Christian N. L. Olivers, & Hedderik van Rijn. (2021). Neural Repetition Suppression Modulates Time Perception: Evidence From Electrophysiology and Pupillometry. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 33(7). 1230–1252. 14 indexed citations
6.
Kruijne, Wouter, et al.. (2021). Implicitly learning when to be ready: From instances to categories. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 29(2). 552–562. 2 indexed citations
7.
Kruijne, Wouter, et al.. (2021). Implicit learning of temporal behavior in complex dynamic environments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 28(4). 1270–1280. 10 indexed citations
8.
Kruijne, Wouter & Hedderik van Rijn. (2021). Change biases identify the features that drive time perception.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 47(9). 1192–1208. 2 indexed citations
9.
Los, Sander A., et al.. (2021). The warning stimulus as retrieval cue: The role of associative memory in temporal preparation. Cognitive Psychology. 125. 101378–101378. 16 indexed citations
10.
Kruijne, Wouter, Sander M. Bohté, Pieter R. Roelfsema, & Christian N. L. Olivers. (2020). Flexible Working Memory Through Selective Gating and Attentional Tagging. Neural Computation. 33(1). 1–40. 23 indexed citations
11.
Kruijne, Wouter & Martijn Meeter. (2017). You prime what you code: The fAIM model of priming of pop-out. PLoS ONE. 12(11). e0187556–e0187556. 2 indexed citations
12.
Kruijne, Wouter, et al.. (2017). Timing a week later: The role of long-term memory in temporal preparation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 24(6). 1900–1905. 21 indexed citations
13.
Kruijne, Wouter & Martijn Meeter. (2016). Long-term priming of visual search prevails against the passage of time and counteracting instructions.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 42(8). 1293–1303. 9 indexed citations
14.
Los, Sander A., Wouter Kruijne, & Martijn Meeter. (2016). Hazard versus history: Temporal preparation is driven by past experience.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 43(1). 78–88. 63 indexed citations
15.
Kruijne, Wouter & Martijn Meeter. (2016). Implicit short- and long-term memory direct our gaze in visual search. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 78(3). 761–773. 17 indexed citations
16.
Kruijne, Wouter & Martijn Meeter. (2015). The long and the short of priming in visual search. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 77(5). 1558–1573. 22 indexed citations
17.
Kruijne, Wouter, Jan W. Brascamp, Árni Kristjánsson, & Martijn Meeter. (2015). Can a single short-term mechanism account for priming of pop-out?. Vision Research. 115(Pt A). 17–22. 15 indexed citations
18.
Kruijne, Wouter, Stefan Van der Stigchel, & Martijn Meeter. (2014). A model of curved saccade trajectories: Spike rate adaptation in the brainstem as the cause of deviation away. Brain and Cognition. 85. 259–270. 8 indexed citations
19.
Los, Sander A., Wouter Kruijne, & Martijn Meeter. (2014). Outlines of a multiple trace theory of temporal preparation. Frontiers in Psychology. 5. 1058–1058. 77 indexed citations
20.
Tsotsos, John K. & Wouter Kruijne. (2014). Cognitive programs: software for attention's executive. Frontiers in Psychology. 5. 1260–1260. 21 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026