Wouter De Groote

907 total citations
16 papers, 155 citations indexed

About

Wouter De Groote is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Pharmacology and Rehabilitation. According to data from OpenAlex, Wouter De Groote has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 155 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 4 papers in Pharmacology and 4 papers in Rehabilitation. Recurrent topics in Wouter De Groote's work include Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (6 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (4 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers). Wouter De Groote is often cited by papers focused on Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (6 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (4 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers). Wouter De Groote collaborates with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Canada. Wouter De Groote's co-authors include Paul Broos, Kim Govaerts, D Stoffelen, Carlotte Kiekens, Chiara Arienti, P Reynders, Stefano Négrini, Amaramalar Selvi Naicker, Annie LeBlanc and Claudio Cordani and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

In The Last Decade

Wouter De Groote

14 papers receiving 152 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Wouter De Groote United States 6 48 46 44 34 28 16 155
Tomás Sebastián Viana Spain 7 18 0.4× 32 0.7× 26 0.6× 17 0.5× 17 0.6× 23 138
Helen Humphreys United Kingdom 7 25 0.5× 118 2.6× 17 0.4× 73 2.1× 10 0.4× 20 243
Janet Bondarenko Australia 8 10 0.2× 36 0.8× 21 0.5× 18 0.5× 22 0.8× 29 312
Denise Forshaw United Kingdom 9 32 0.7× 27 0.6× 24 0.5× 14 0.4× 45 1.6× 17 211
Emily Hume United Kingdom 10 15 0.3× 37 0.8× 39 0.9× 19 0.6× 18 0.6× 21 211
Loïc Péran France 9 9 0.2× 33 0.7× 16 0.4× 15 0.4× 13 0.5× 22 340
Carolyn L. Kinney United States 8 33 0.7× 27 0.6× 15 0.3× 8 0.2× 12 0.4× 35 165
Daria Parsons Canada 8 24 0.5× 84 1.8× 19 0.4× 17 0.5× 132 4.7× 16 309
Marla Robinson United States 7 12 0.3× 9 0.2× 13 0.3× 13 0.4× 30 1.1× 12 124
Trina Limberg United States 6 8 0.2× 30 0.7× 13 0.3× 16 0.5× 38 1.4× 6 418

Countries citing papers authored by Wouter De Groote

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wouter De Groote's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wouter De Groote with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wouter De Groote more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wouter De Groote

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wouter De Groote. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wouter De Groote. The network helps show where Wouter De Groote may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wouter De Groote

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wouter De Groote. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wouter De Groote based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Wouter De Groote. Wouter De Groote is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
1.
Frontera, Walter R., Claudio Cordani, Simon Décary, et al.. (2024). Relevance and use of health policy, health systems and health services research for strengthening rehabilitation in real-life settings: methodological considerations. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. 60(1). 154–163. 3 indexed citations
2.
Htwe, Ohnmar, et al.. (2024). Barriers and facilitators for increased accessibility to quality rehabilitation services in low- and middle- income countries: a systematic review. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. 60(3). 514–522. 4 indexed citations
3.
Frontera, Walter R., Wouter De Groote, & Abdul Ghaffar. (2023). Importance of health policy and systems research for strengthening rehabilitation in health systems: a call to action to accelerate progress. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4. 1303135–1303135.
4.
Wong, Jessica J., Sheilah Hogg‐Johnson, Wouter De Groote, et al.. (2023). Minimal important difference of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 in persons with chronic low back pain. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies. 31(1). 49–49. 1 indexed citations
5.
Négrini, Stefano, Carlotte Kiekens, Claudio Cordani, Chiara Arienti, & Wouter De Groote. (2022). Cochrane "evidence relevant to" rehabilitation of people with post COVID-19 condition. What it is and how it has been mapped to inform the development of the World Health Organization recommendations. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. 58(6). 853–856. 15 indexed citations
6.
Wong, Jessica J., Sheilah Hogg‐Johnson, Wouter De Groote, et al.. (2022). Measurement Properties and Minimal Important Change of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in Persons With Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 104(2). 287–301. 5 indexed citations
7.
Munblit, Daniel, Timothy R. Nicholson, Athena Akrami, et al.. (2022). Core Outcome Set for Research and Clinical Practice in Post COVID-19 Condition (Long COVID): An International Delphi Consensus Study ‘PC-COS’. SSRN Electronic Journal. 4 indexed citations
8.
Décary, Simon, Wouter De Groote, Chiara Arienti, et al.. (2022). Scoping review of rehabilitation care models for post COVID-19 condition. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 100(11). 676–688. 36 indexed citations
9.
Wong, Jessica J., Sheilah Hogg‐Johnson, Wouter De Groote, et al.. (2022). Pre-rehabilitation scores of functioning measured using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule in persons with nonspecific low back pain: a scoping review. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research. 45(4). 302–310. 3 indexed citations
10.
Naicker, Amaramalar Selvi, et al.. (2019). Facilitators and Barriers to the Rehabilitation Workforce Capacity Building in Low- to Middle-Income Countries. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America. 30(4). 867–877. 16 indexed citations
11.
Groote, Wouter De. (2019). Concept Changes and Standardizing Tools in Community-Based Rehabilitation. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America. 30(4). 709–721. 6 indexed citations
12.
Khan, Fary, Bhasker Amatya, Wouter De Groote, et al.. (2018). Capacity-building in clinical skills of rehabilitation workforce in low- and middle-income countries. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 50(5). 472–479. 19 indexed citations
13.
Reynders, P, et al.. (1996). Monteggia lesions in adults. A multicenter Bota study.. PubMed. 62 Suppl 1. 78–83. 35 indexed citations
14.
Broos, Paul, et al.. (1995). The use of unreamed tibia nail in the treatment of tibial fractures with severe soft tissue injuries. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume. 94–95.
15.
Groote, Wouter De, et al.. (1993). Treatment of tibial shaft fractures by interlocking nailing.. PubMed. 59(4). 381–9. 3 indexed citations
16.
Vandekerckhove, Bart, et al.. (1985). Surgical treatment of acromioclavicular dislocations. Long-term follow-up study.. PubMed. 51(1). 66–79. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Tomás Sebastián Viana Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Helen Humphreys Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Janet Bondarenko Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Denise Forshaw Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Emily Hume Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Loïc Péran Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Carolyn L. Kinney Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Daria Parsons Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Marla Robinson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Trina Limberg
Rankless by CCL
2026