Wolfgang Sitte
About
In The Last Decade
Wolfgang Sitte
6 papers receiving 421 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Psychiatry and Mental health 348
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 151
- Clinical Psychology 114
- Cognitive Neuroscience 107
- Social Psychology 94
Countries citing papers authored by Wolfgang Sitte
This map shows the geographic impact of Wolfgang Sitte's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wolfgang Sitte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wolfgang Sitte more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Wolfgang Sitte
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wolfgang Sitte. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wolfgang Sitte. The network helps show where Wolfgang Sitte may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wolfgang Sitte
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wolfgang Sitte. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wolfgang Sitte based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Wolfgang Sitte. Wolfgang Sitte is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 296 | |
| 3 | 42 | |
| 4 | 50 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 30 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.