Jaime J. Castrellon

1.9k total citations
15 papers, 445 citations indexed

About

Jaime J. Castrellon is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Jaime J. Castrellon has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 445 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 5 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 3 papers in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology. Recurrent topics in Jaime J. Castrellon's work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (7 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (5 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (4 papers). Jaime J. Castrellon is often cited by papers focused on Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (7 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (5 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (4 papers). Jaime J. Castrellon collaborates with scholars based in United States and Switzerland. Jaime J. Castrellon's co-authors include Gregory R. Samanez‐Larkin, David H. Zald, Linh C. Dang, Ronald L. Cowan, Scott F. Perkins, Kendra Leigh Seaman, Ming Hsu, Christopher T. Smith, Paul Newhouse and Teresa M. Karrer and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, NeuroImage and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Jaime J. Castrellon

14 papers receiving 437 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Jaime J. Castrellon United States	12	213	97	81	64	58	15	445
Scott F. Perkins United States	9	143 0.7×	75 0.8×	62 0.8×	31 0.5×	64 1.1×	10	316
Jessica A. Cooper United States	12	227 1.1×	151 1.6×	62 0.8×	50 0.8×	67 1.2×	23	550
H DAVIS United States	6	266 1.2×	109 1.1×	34 0.4×	41 0.6×	27 0.5×	8	441
Lin Nga United States	9	278 1.3×	184 1.9×	21 0.3×	73 1.1×	56 1.0×	10	574
A. M. Owen United Kingdom	2	438 2.1×	127 1.3×	118 1.5×	56 0.9×	126 2.2×	4	675
Kazuyo Tanji Japan	8	545 2.6×	189 1.9×	42 0.5×	63 1.0×	32 0.6×	14	693
Zachary Yaple Singapore	13	385 1.8×	117 1.2×	43 0.5×	47 0.7×	43 0.7×	22	553
Kaoru Nashiro United States	14	444 2.1×	140 1.4×	23 0.3×	53 0.8×	38 0.7×	32	685
Monja I. Froböse Netherlands	12	221 1.0×	83 0.9×	95 1.2×	27 0.4×	51 0.9×	17	404
Briana L. Kennedy Australia	12	320 1.5×	91 0.9×	34 0.4×	31 0.5×	21 0.4×	30	408

Countries citing papers authored by Jaime J. Castrellon

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jaime J. Castrellon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jaime J. Castrellon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jaime J. Castrellon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jaime J. Castrellon

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jaime J. Castrellon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jaime J. Castrellon. The network helps show where Jaime J. Castrellon may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jaime J. Castrellon

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jaime J. Castrellon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jaime J. Castrellon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jaime J. Castrellon. Jaime J. Castrellon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

15 of 15 papers shown

Castrellon, Jaime J., David H. Zald, Gregory R. Samanez‐Larkin, & Kendra Leigh Seaman. (2023). Adult age-related differences in susceptibility to social conformity pressures in self-control over daily desires.. Psychology and Aging. 39(1). 102–112. 7 indexed citations

Castrellon, Jaime J., Shabnam Hakimi, David A. Ball, et al.. (2022). Social cognitive processes explain bias in juror decisions. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 18(1).

Castrellon, Jaime J., et al.. (2020). Dopaminergic modulation of reward discounting in healthy rats: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychopharmacology. 238(3). 711–723. 18 indexed citations

Castrellon, Jaime J., et al.. (2020). Emotion dynamics across adulthood in everyday life: Older adults are more emotionally stable and better at regulating desires.. Emotion. 21(3). 453–464. 66 indexed citations

Castrellon, Jaime J., Mikella A Green, Jennifer L. Crawford, et al.. (2019). Reproducibility of the correlative triad among aging, dopamine receptor availability, and cognition.. Psychology and Aging. 34(7). 921–932. 13 indexed citations

Seaman, Kendra Leigh, Christopher T. Smith, Linh C. Dang, et al.. (2019). Differential regional decline in dopamine receptor availability across adulthood: Linear and nonlinear effects of age. Human Brain Mapping. 40(10). 3125–3138. 46 indexed citations

Castrellon, Jaime J., Jacob S. Young, Linh C. Dang, et al.. (2019). Mesolimbic dopamine D2 receptors and neural representations of subjective value. Scientific Reports. 9(1). 20229–20229. 14 indexed citations

Castrellon, Jaime J., Kendra Leigh Seaman, Jennifer L. Crawford, et al.. (2018). Individual Differences in Dopamine Are Associated with Reward Discounting in Clinical Groups But Not in Healthy Adults. Journal of Neuroscience. 39(2). 321–332. 25 indexed citations

Seaman, Kendra Leigh, Teresa M. Karrer, Jaime J. Castrellon, et al.. (2018). Subjective value representations during effort, probability and time discounting across adulthood. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 13(5). 449–459. 63 indexed citations

10.

Dang, Linh C., Gregory R. Samanez‐Larkin, Jaime J. Castrellon, et al.. (2018). Individual differences in dopamine D2 receptor availability correlate with reward valuation. Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience. 18(4). 739–747. 11 indexed citations

11.

Dang, Linh C., Gregory R. Samanez‐Larkin, Jaime J. Castrellon, et al.. (2017). Spontaneous Eye Blink Rate (EBR) Is Uncorrelated with Dopamine D2 Receptor Availability and Unmodulated by Dopamine Agonism in Healthy Adults. eNeuro. 4(5). ENEURO.0211–17.2017. 61 indexed citations

12.

Dang, Linh C., Jaime J. Castrellon, Scott F. Perkins, et al.. (2017). Reduced effects of age on dopamine D2 receptor levels in physically active adults. NeuroImage. 148. 123–129. 29 indexed citations

13.

Dang, Linh C., Gregory R. Samanez‐Larkin, Christopher T. Smith, et al.. (2017). FTO affects food cravings and interacts with age to influence age-related decline in food cravings. Physiology & Behavior. 192. 188–193. 16 indexed citations

14.

Barber, Sarah J., Jaime J. Castrellon, Philipp C. Opitz, & Mara Mather. (2017). Younger and older adults’ collaborative recall of shared and unshared emotional pictures. Memory & Cognition. 45(5). 716–730. 23 indexed citations

15.

Dang, Linh C., Gregory R. Samanez‐Larkin, Jaime J. Castrellon, et al.. (2016). Associations between dopamine D2 receptor availability and BMI depend on age. NeuroImage. 138. 176–183. 53 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact