Martin Peper

1.5k total citations
44 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Martin Peper is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Martin Peper has authored 44 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 14 papers in Clinical Psychology and 9 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Martin Peper's work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (8 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (7 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (5 papers). Martin Peper is often cited by papers focused on Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (8 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (7 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (5 papers). Martin Peper collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Martin Peper's co-authors include Christoph Klein, Eva Irle, B. Wowra, Stefan Kunze, Dieter Vaitl, Rudolf Stark, M Klett, Wolfgang Ambach, M. Zachary Rosenthal and Jana Mauchnik and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Scientific Reports and Biological Psychiatry.

In The Last Decade

Martin Peper

41 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Martin Peper
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 489
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 390
  • Clinical Psychology 211
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 132
  • Social Psychology 100
Replace Emily M. Briceño with:
Emily M. Briceño United States
Mace Beckson United States
Janusch Blautzik Germany
Alissa M. Butts United States
Ching‐Jui Chang Taiwan
Elisabetta Farina Italy
Paula Suárez‐Pinilla Spain
Silvia Oddo Argentina
Gillian E. Cooke United States
Mehul A. Trivedi United States
Emily M. Briceño United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Martin Peper
Martin Peper · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Martin Peper
Martin Peper · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Martin Peper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Martin Peper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Martin Peper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Martin Peper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Martin Peper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Martin Peper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Martin Peper. The network helps show where Martin Peper may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Martin Peper

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Martin Peper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Martin Peper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Martin Peper. Martin Peper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 11
3 15
4 6
5 23
6 33
7 27
8 3
9 340
10 28
11 26
12 13
13 33
14 46
15 26
16 25
17 26
18 70
19 8
20
[Evaluation of the toxicity of particle-bound dioxins and furans in the environment of a metal plant].
1

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026