Wolf D. Oswald

31 papers receiving 455 citations

Peers

Wolf D. Oswald
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 39
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 179
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 34
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 22
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 42
Replace Edward P. Feher with:
Edward P. Feher United States
Yohko Maki Japan
Edwin C. S. Yu Hong Kong
Iris Rawtaer Singapore
Emílio Herrera Brazil
Valeska Marinho Brazil
Gina Poelke United States
Patricia Housen United States
Danilla Icassatti Corazza Brazil
Cássio M.C. Bottino Brazil
Wolf D. Oswald relative to Edward P. Feher United States Edward P. Feher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Edward P. Feher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wolf D. Oswald

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wolf D. Oswald's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wolf D. Oswald with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wolf D. Oswald more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wolf D. Oswald

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wolf D. Oswald. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wolf D. Oswald. The network helps show where Wolf D. Oswald may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Wolf D. Oswald, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wolf D. Oswald Line = papers co-authored together Wolf D. Oswald links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006188
2 199666
3 198834
4 198531
5 197824
6 200222
7 200820
8 200012
9 200711
10 200111
11 200610
12
Autovaloración de calidad de vida y envejecimiento en adultos con riesgo de Alzheimer
20089
13 20048
14 19996
15 20025
16 20004
17 20024
18 20034
19 19993
20 20063

About Wolf D. Oswald

Wolf D. Oswald is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health, Health, Clinical Psychology and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 496 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health and Medical Studies (13 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (11 papers), Social and Demographic Issues in Germany (6 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (5 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (5 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (4 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (4 papers) and Health and Well-being Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (39 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (179 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (34 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (22 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (42 citations). Wolf D. Oswald has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Colombia and Austria. Frequent co-authors include R. Rupprecht, Thomas Gunzelmann, B Hagen, Karin Tritt, Ralf Kohnen, Andreas Ackermann, Jessica Pingel, D. Welzel, Daniel Acevedo and Karl G Gassmann. Their work appears in journals such as Pharmacopsychiatry, International Psychogeriatrics, European Journal of Ageing, Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics and Behavioural Brain Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact