W.J. Mader

827 citations
39 papers · 549 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

W.J. Mader

35 papers receiving 394 citations

Peers

W.J. Mader
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Analytical Chemistry 107
  • Filtration and Separation 17
  • Spectroscopy 126
  • Pharmaceutical Science 37
  • Developmental Biology 11
Replace Jeffrey A. Peterson with:
Jeffrey A. Peterson United States
C. J. O. R. Morris United Kingdom
Dongjin Pyo South Korea
Edward Richards New Zealand
Stephen F. Donovan United States
H. Virelizier France
James R. Baarda United States
A. F. Isbell United States
G. Pataki Hungary
Joan F. Powell United States
W.J. Mader relative to Jeffrey A. Peterson United States Jeffrey A. Peterson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Jeffrey A. Peterson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W.J. Mader

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W.J. Mader's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W.J. Mader with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W.J. Mader more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W.J. Mader

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W.J. Mader. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W.J. Mader. The network helps show where W.J. Mader may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside W.J. Mader, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W.J. Mader Line = papers co-authored together W.J. Mader links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1952144
2 195246
3 197341
4 198133
5 198229
6 195625
7 197025
8 197522
9 197019
10 197816
11 197911
12 195911
13 196611
14 19579
15 19719
16 19689
17 19619
18
A colorimetric procedure for imidazolines.
19578
19 19578
20 19526

About W.J. Mader

W.J. Mader is a scholar working on Analytical Chemistry, Spectroscopy, Organic Chemistry, Ecology and Bioengineering, having authored 39 papers that have together received 549 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (8 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (7 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (5 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (5 papers), Crystallization and Solubility Studies (3 papers), Plant-based Medicinal Research (3 papers), Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure (2 papers) and Chemistry and Chemical Engineering (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Analytical Chemistry (107 citations), Filtration and Separation (17 citations), Spectroscopy (126 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (37 citations) and Developmental Biology (11 citations). W.J. Mader has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Takeru Higuchi, G. J. Papariello, Lee T. Grady, Tsunehiko Higuchi and Hans Siebert. Their work appears in journals such as Analytical Chemistry, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ornithological Applications, The Auk and Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact