Wing‐Sham Lee
Impact in
- Plant Science top 5%
- Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
- Plant Virus Research Studies
- Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
- Plant Parasitism and Resistance
- Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics
- Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis
- Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies
- Endocrinology top 10%
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity 6
- Plant Virus Research Studies 6
- Plant Parasitism and Resistance 2
- Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics 2
- Plant pathogens and resistance mechanisms 1
-
- Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms 1
- Co-authors
- K. Kanyuka (5 shared papers)K. E. Hammond‐Kosack (4 shared papers)J. J. Rudd (3 shared papers)Shih‐Feng Fu (2 shared papers)John P. Carr (2 shared papers)Jeanmarie Verchot (1 shared paper)Srinivasa R. Chaluvadi (1 shared paper)Zheng Li (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions (2 papers)BMC Plant Biology (2 papers)Fungal Biology (1 paper)PLANT PHYSIOLOGY (1 paper)Fungal Genetics and Biology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Wing‐Sham Lee
8 papers receiving 476 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
- Plant Science 462
- Endocrinology 45
- Biotechnology 31
- Cell Biology 56
- Insect Science 42
Countries citing papers authored by Wing‐Sham Lee
This map shows the geographic impact of Wing‐Sham Lee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wing‐Sham Lee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wing‐Sham Lee more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Wing‐Sham Lee
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wing‐Sham Lee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wing‐Sham Lee. The network helps show where Wing‐Sham Lee may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 15 scholars most cited alongside Wing‐Sham Lee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 128 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 121 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 69 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 60 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 53 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 22 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 22 | |
| 8 | 2024 | 4 |
About Wing‐Sham Lee
Wing‐Sham Lee is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Endocrinology, Insect Science and Infectious Diseases, having authored 8 papers that have together received 479 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (6 papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (6 papers), Plant and Fungal Interactions Research (2 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (2 papers), Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (2 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (1 paper), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (1 paper) and Plant pathogens and resistance mechanisms (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (462 citations), Endocrinology (45 citations), Biotechnology (31 citations), Cell Biology (56 citations) and Insect Science (42 citations). Wing‐Sham Lee has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include K. Kanyuka, K. E. Hammond‐Kosack, J. J. Rudd, Shih‐Feng Fu, John P. Carr, Jeanmarie Verchot, Srinivasa R. Chaluvadi, Zheng Li, Alex M. Murphy and Mathew G. Lewsey. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, BMC Plant Biology, Fungal Biology, PLANT PHYSIOLOGY and Fungal Genetics and Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.