Wim van Oeveren
- Surgery top 5%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering top 5%
- Nephrology top 1%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 5%
- Co-authors
- Gerhard RakhorstHarry van GoorRon T. GansevoortPaul E. de JongStephan J. L. BakkerFerdau L. NautaAurora M. MorariuAnne H. Epema
- Topics
- Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (20 papers)Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (10 papers)Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsItalyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Wim van Oeveren
83 papers receiving 2.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
- Surgery 1.1k
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 579
- Biomedical Engineering 530
- Nephrology 502
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 493
Countries citing papers authored by Wim van Oeveren
This map shows the geographic impact of Wim van Oeveren's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wim van Oeveren with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wim van Oeveren more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Wim van Oeveren
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wim van Oeveren. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wim van Oeveren. The network helps show where Wim van Oeveren may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wim van Oeveren
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wim van Oeveren. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wim van Oeveren based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Wim van Oeveren. Wim van Oeveren is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 45 | |
| 2 | 68 | |
| 3 | 104 | |
| 4 | 24 | |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | The Value of Six Biomarkers Obtained during Machine Perfusion to Predict Immediate Function and Kidney Transplant Outcome. | 7 |
| 7 | 84 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 61 | |
| 13 | 45 | |
| 14 | 17 | |
| 15 | 79 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 16 | |
| 18 | Surface Modifying Additives Reduce Thrombogenicity: An In Vitro and Clinical Evaluation | 3 |
| 19 | 27 | |
| 20 | 14 |
About Wim van Oeveren
Wim van Oeveren is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Nephrology and Transplantation, having authored 83 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (20 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (10 papers) and Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (502 citations), Transplantation (148 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (218 citations). Wim van Oeveren has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Italy and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Gerhard Rakhorst, Harry van Goor, Ron T. Gansevoort, Paul E. de Jong, Stephan J. L. Bakker, Ferdau L. Nauta, Aurora M. Morariu, Anne H. Epema, Gerjan Navis and Rutger J. Ploeg. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.