Wim Stut

680 citations
34 papers · 456 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Wim Stut

34 papers receiving 436 citations

Peers

Wim Stut
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Rehabilitation 73
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 215
  • Family Practice 16
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 59
  • Applied Psychology 27
Replace Caroline Chessex with:
Caroline Chessex Canada
Bridget Abell Australia
C.H. Ferry Australia
Gabriela Chaves Brazil
Bettina Seekatz Germany
Ann Kirkness Australia
Reema Kadri United States
Beilei Lin China
Maarten Falter Belgium
Mayra Lopez United States
Wim Stut relative to Caroline Chessex Canada Caroline Chessex's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Caroline Chessex · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wim Stut

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wim Stut's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wim Stut with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wim Stut more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wim Stut

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wim Stut. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wim Stut. The network helps show where Wim Stut may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Wim Stut, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wim Stut Line = papers co-authored together Wim Stut links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017162
2 201876
3 201738
4 201524
5 201613
6 202111
7 198811
8 201510
9 201410
10 201510
11 20149
12 19998
13 19917
14 19907
15 20207
16 20136
17 19895
18 20175
19 19894
20
Activity Maintenance After Pulmonary Rehabilitation - First Results Of An Online Coaching Program
20173

About Wim Stut

Wim Stut is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Complementary and alternative medicine and General Health Professions, having authored 34 papers that have together received 456 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (12 papers), Cardiac Health and Mental Health (6 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (6 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (5 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (5 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (4 papers) and Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (73 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (215 citations), Family Practice (16 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (59 citations) and Applied Psychology (27 citations). Wim Stut has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Finland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Hareld Kemps, Jos J. Kraal, Niels Peek, M. Elske van den Akker‐van Marle, Ameen Abu‐Hanna, Bart A. Kamphorst, Joel Anderson, Sanne Nauts, Denise T. D. de Ridder and John G.F. Cleland. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Digital Imaging, European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, Patient Preference and Adherence, Behavioral Sleep Medicine and Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact