Wilma Rule

2.0k total citations
18 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Wilma Rule is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Political Science and International Relations and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Wilma Rule has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Gender Studies, 3 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 1 paper in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology. Recurrent topics in Wilma Rule's work include Gender Politics and Representation (12 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (1 paper) and Electoral Systems and Political Participation (1 paper). Wilma Rule is often cited by papers focused on Gender Politics and Representation (12 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (1 paper) and Electoral Systems and Political Participation (1 paper). Wilma Rule collaborates with scholars based in United States. Wilma Rule's co-authors include Joseph F. Zimmerman and has published in prestigious journals such as American Political Science Review, The Gerontologist and PS Political Science & Politics.

In The Last Decade

Wilma Rule

17 papers receiving 925 citations

Peers

Wilma Rule
Rainbow Murray United Kingdom
Sarah A. Fulton United States
Melody E. Valdini United States
Kathryn Pearson United States
Farida Jalalzai United States
Kristin Kanthak United States
Vicky Randall United Kingdom
Alice J. Kang United States
Timothy Heppell United Kingdom
Rainbow Murray United Kingdom
Wilma Rule
Citations per year, relative to Wilma Rule Wilma Rule (= 1×) peers Rainbow Murray

Countries citing papers authored by Wilma Rule

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wilma Rule's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wilma Rule with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wilma Rule more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wilma Rule

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wilma Rule. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wilma Rule. The network helps show where Wilma Rule may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wilma Rule

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wilma Rule. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wilma Rule based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Wilma Rule. Wilma Rule is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Zimmerman, Joseph F. & Wilma Rule. (1998). A More Representative United States House of Representatives?. PS Political Science & Politics. 31(1). 5–10. 4 indexed citations
3.
Zimmerman, Joseph F. & Wilma Rule. (1998). A More Representative United States House of Representatives?. PS Political Science & Politics. 31(1). 5–10. 1 indexed citations
4.
Rule, Wilma. (1996). Response to Wolfgang Hirczy. PS Political Science & Politics. 29(2). 143–143. 1 indexed citations
5.
Rule, Wilma. (1995). Why women should be included in the voting rights act. National Civic Review. 84(4). 355–368. 2 indexed citations
6.
Rule, Wilma. (1994). Women's Underrepresentation and Electoral Systems. PS Political Science & Politics. 27(4). 689–692. 58 indexed citations
7.
Rule, Wilma. (1994). Women's Underrepresentation and Electoral Systems. PS Political Science & Politics. 27(4). 689–692. 26 indexed citations
8.
Rule, Wilma & Joseph F. Zimmerman. (1994). Electoral Systems in Comparative Perspective: Their Impact on Women and Minorities. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 141 indexed citations
9.
Rule, Wilma & Joseph F. Zimmerman. (1992). United States electoral systems : their impact on women and minorities. Praeger eBooks. 51 indexed citations
10.
Rule, Wilma. (1990). Why More Women Are State Legislators. The Western Political Quarterly. 43(2). 437–448. 53 indexed citations
11.
Rule, Wilma. (1990). Why More Women Are State Legislators. A Research Note. The Western Political Quarterly. 43(2). 437–437. 46 indexed citations
12.
Rule, Wilma. (1987). Electoral Systems, Contextual Factors and Women's Opportunity for Election to Parliament in Twenty-Three Democracies. The Western Political Quarterly. 40(3). 477–498. 286 indexed citations
13.
Rule, Wilma. (1987). Electoral Systems, Contextual Factors and Women's Opportunity for Election to Parliament in Twenty-Three Democracies. The Western Political Quarterly. 40(3). 477–477. 191 indexed citations
14.
Rule, Wilma. (1986). Does the Electoral System Discriminate Against Women?. PS. 19(4). 864–867. 3 indexed citations
15.
Rule, Wilma. (1986). Does the Electoral System Discriminate Against Women?. PS Political Science & Politics. 19(4). 864–867. 4 indexed citations
16.
Rule, Wilma. (1981). Why Women Don't Run: The Critical Contextual Factors in Women's Legislative Recruitment. The Western Political Quarterly. 34(1). 60–60. 112 indexed citations
17.
Rule, Wilma. (1981). Why Women Don't Run: The Critical Contextual Factors in Women's Legislative Recruitment. The Western Political Quarterly. 34(1). 60–77. 140 indexed citations
18.
Rule, Wilma. (1977). Political Alienation and Voting Attitudes Among the Elderly Generation. The Gerontologist. 17(5 Part 1). 400–404. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026