William Throop

656 total citations
12 papers, 421 citations indexed

About

William Throop is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, William Throop has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 421 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 3 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 2 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in William Throop's work include Environmental Philosophy and Ethics (2 papers), Plant Surface Properties and Treatments (2 papers) and Climate Change and Geoengineering (2 papers). William Throop is often cited by papers focused on Environmental Philosophy and Ethics (2 papers), Plant Surface Properties and Treatments (2 papers) and Climate Change and Geoengineering (2 papers). William Throop collaborates with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Australia. William Throop's co-authors include Richard J. Hobbs, J. Arthur Harris, Stephen T. Jackson, Donald A. Falk, Jeanine M. Rhemtulla, Anita Guerrini, Eric Higgs, Marcus Hall, Alastair S. Gunn and Robert T. Lackey and has published in prestigious journals such as Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, Restoration Ecology and Transactions of the ASABE.

In The Last Decade

William Throop

10 papers receiving 388 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
William Throop United States	6	221	173	146	64	44	12	421
Katrina Z. S. Schwartz United States	9	311 1.4×	194 1.1×	158 1.1×	114 1.8×	32 0.7×	11	662
Gloria Pungetti United Kingdom	7	190 0.9×	82 0.5×	120 0.8×	58 0.9×	30 0.7×	16	419
Franz Höchtl Germany	7	363 1.6×	170 1.0×	106 0.7×	78 1.2×	19 0.4×	12	600
Lucas Stephens United States	3	209 0.9×	96 0.6×	159 1.1×	50 0.8×	45 1.0×	5	483
Arthur S. Lieberman Israel	4	375 1.7×	228 1.3×	186 1.3×	91 1.4×	29 0.7×	7	678
Ewa H. Orlikowska Sweden	11	253 1.1×	151 0.9×	166 1.1×	94 1.5×	49 1.1×	15	484
Convention sur la diversité biologique. Secrétariat	2	249 1.1×	130 0.8×	170 1.2×	105 1.6×	100 2.3×	2	508
Jerzy Solon Poland	11	237 1.1×	114 0.7×	116 0.8×	42 0.7×	17 0.4×	60	505
Susan M. Canney United Kingdom	6	118 0.5×	101 0.6×	112 0.8×	43 0.7×	49 1.1×	7	277
Peter Shadie Australia	7	161 0.7×	61 0.4×	126 0.9×	70 1.1×	37 0.8×	11	371

Countries citing papers authored by William Throop

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Throop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Throop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Throop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Throop

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Throop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Throop. The network helps show where William Throop may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Throop

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Throop. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Throop based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Throop. William Throop is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

12 of 12 papers shown

1.

Throop, William. (2017). The Anthropocene Project: Virtue in an Age of Climate Change. Environmental Ethics. 39(1). 105–108. 1 indexed citations

2.

Throop, William, et al.. (2017). Leadership for the Sustainability Transition. Business and Society Review. 122(2). 221–250. 18 indexed citations

3.

Throop, William. (2016). Flourishing in the Age of Climate Change: Finding the Heart of Sustainability. Midwest Studies in Philosophy. 40(1). 296–314.

4.

Higgs, Eric, Donald A. Falk, Anita Guerrini, et al.. (2014). The changing role of history in restoration ecology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 12(9). 499–506. 288 indexed citations

5.

Thistle, Harold W., et al.. (2014). A Buffelgrass Aerial Spraying Pilot Project: Spray Application and Deposition. Applied Engineering in Agriculture. 17–24. 5 indexed citations

6.

Thistle, Harold W., et al.. (2012). Deposition of Aerially Released Bt over a 2 km Sampling Grid. Transactions of the ASABE. 55(6). 2067–2078. 2 indexed citations

7.

Throop, William, et al.. (2006). Wilderness Restoration: The Paradox of Public Participation. Restoration Ecology. 14(4). 493–499. 14 indexed citations

8.

Hobbs, Richard J., et al.. (2004). Restoration Ecology: The Challenge of Social Values and Expectations. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 2(1). 43–43. 53 indexed citations

9.

Gunn, Alastair S. & William Throop. (2002). Environmental Restoration—Ethics, Theory, and Practice. Restoration Ecology. 10(4). 733–734. 30 indexed citations

10.

Throop, William. (2001). Restoring Nature. Ecological Restoration. 19(4). 215–217. 2 indexed citations

11.

Schwartz, Stephen P. & William Throop. (1991). Intuitionism and vagueness. Erkenntnis. 34(3). 6 indexed citations

12.

Throop, William, et al.. (1991). Putnam's realism and relativity: An uneasy balance. Erkenntnis. 34(3). 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact