William Tam
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 5%
- Surgery top 10%
- Oncology top 10%
- Gastroenterology top 1%
- Nutrition and Dietetics
- Co-authors
- Stephen J. WilliamsRajvinder SinghLuke F. HouriganMichael J. BourkeGregor J. BrownRebecca SonsonNicholas G. BurgessSimon Zanati
- Topics
- Esophageal and GI Pathology (6 papers)Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (5 papers)Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesChina
In The Last Decade
William Tam
24 papers receiving 898 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 575
- Surgery 479
- Oncology 363
- Gastroenterology 345
- Nutrition and Dietetics 70
Countries citing papers authored by William Tam
This map shows the geographic impact of William Tam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Tam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Tam more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Tam
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Tam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Tam. The network helps show where William Tam may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Tam
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Tam. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Tam based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Tam. William Tam is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | Long-term adenoma recurrence following wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection (WF-EMR) for advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia is infrequent: results and risk factors in 1000 cases from the Australian Colonic EMR (ACE) studybreakdown → | 335 |
| 5 | 182 | |
| 6 | 35 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 51 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 91 | |
| 17 | Randomised controlled trial of ablation of Barrett's oesophagus with argon plasma coagulation in postfundoplication patients: 1-year data | 1 |
| 18 | 0 | |
| 19 | 94 | |
| 20 | Radiological cases of the month. Septo-optic dysplasia (De Morsier syndrome). | 10 |
About William Tam
William Tam is a scholar working on Gastroenterology, Medical Laboratory Technology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 25 papers that have together received 913 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Esophageal and GI Pathology (6 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (5 papers) and Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (345 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (575 citations) and Oncology (363 citations). William Tam has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Stephen J. Williams, Rajvinder Singh, Luke F. Hourigan, Michael J. Bourke, Gregor J. Brown, Rebecca Sonson, Nicholas G. Burgess, Simon Zanati, Karen Byth and Alan Moss. Their work appears in journals such as Gastroenterology, Gut and American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.