William T. Snyder
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Mechanical Engineering
- Computational Mechanics top 10%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Co-authors
- John R. LionDaniel J. MitchellE. THOMPSONChing‐Rong HuangM. MatloszRobert M. PearlsteinFriedrich Schmidt-BleekAlexander Hollaender
- Topics
- Tribology and Lubrication Engineering (6 papers)Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (5 papers)Heat Transfer and Optimization (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
William T. Snyder
25 papers receiving 550 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Clinical Psychology 162
- Sociology and Political Science 159
- Mechanical Engineering 142
- Computational Mechanics 138
- Biomedical Engineering 108
Countries citing papers authored by William T. Snyder
This map shows the geographic impact of William T. Snyder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William T. Snyder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William T. Snyder more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William T. Snyder
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William T. Snyder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William T. Snyder. The network helps show where William T. Snyder may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William T. Snyder
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William T. Snyder. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William T. Snyder based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William T. Snyder. William T. Snyder is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 68 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | An inquiry into biological energy conversion. | 18 |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 16 | |
| 13 | 25 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | Thermal aspects of magnetohydrodynamic lubrication | 0 |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 21 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 32 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About William T. Snyder
William T. Snyder is a scholar working on Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Computational Mechanics and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 28 papers that have together received 613 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tribology and Lubrication Engineering (6 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (5 papers) and Heat Transfer and Optimization (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (162 citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (41 citations) and Computational Mechanics (138 citations). William T. Snyder has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include John R. Lion, Daniel J. Mitchell, E. THOMPSON, Ching‐Rong Huang, M. Matlosz, Robert M. Pearlstein, Friedrich Schmidt-Bleek, Alexander Hollaender, Stephen Licht and J. Waight. Their work appears in journals such as Optics Letters, AIChE Journal and AIAA Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.