William T. Sawyer
- Hematology top 5%
- Oncology top 10%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Surgery
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Celeste LindleyEric P. WinerJeannine S. McCuneHarold R. RobertsB. Gail MacikStephen GlazerRobert E. DupuisBrian Ginsberg
- Topics
- Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (4 papers)Pharmaceutical studies and practices (4 papers)Poisoning and overdose treatments (3 papers)
- Cited by
- HematologyInternal MedicineOncology
- Journals
- Journal of Clinical OncologyAmerican Journal of PsychiatryJournal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
William T. Sawyer
32 papers receiving 976 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
- Hematology 260
- Oncology 245
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 147
- Surgery 138
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 119
Countries citing papers authored by William T. Sawyer
This map shows the geographic impact of William T. Sawyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William T. Sawyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William T. Sawyer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William T. Sawyer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William T. Sawyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William T. Sawyer. The network helps show where William T. Sawyer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William T. Sawyer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William T. Sawyer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William T. Sawyer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William T. Sawyer. William T. Sawyer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 34 | |
| 2 | 49 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 171 | |
| 5 | 28 | |
| 6 | 229 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | Appropriate use of heparin. Empiric vs nomogram-based dosing. | 45 |
| 10 | 209 | |
| 11 | 56 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | Effect of four intravenous infusion methods on tobramycin pharmacokinetics. | 12 |
| 14 | Accuracy of tobramycin delivery by four i.v. infusion methods. | 9 |
| 15 | 16 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 33 | |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | 0 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About William T. Sawyer
William T. Sawyer is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Internal Medicine and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (4 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (4 papers) and Poisoning and overdose treatments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hematology (260 citations), Internal Medicine (67 citations) and Oncology (245 citations). William T. Sawyer has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Celeste Lindley, Eric P. Winer, Jeannine S. McCune, Harold R. Roberts, B. Gail Macik, Stephen Glazer, Robert E. Dupuis, Brian Ginsberg, Marcus L. Williams and Joni I. Berry. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Journal of Psychiatry and Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.