R. Stephen Porter

47 total papers · 839 total citations
29 papers, 623 citations indexed

About

R. Stephen Porter is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Molecular Biology and Pharmacology. According to data from OpenAlex, R. Stephen Porter has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 623 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 4 papers in Molecular Biology and 3 papers in Pharmacology. Recurrent topics in R. Stephen Porter's work include Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (4 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (4 papers) and Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (3 papers). R. Stephen Porter is often cited by papers focused on Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (4 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (4 papers) and Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (3 papers). R. Stephen Porter collaborates with scholars based in United States, Thailand and United Kingdom. R. Stephen Porter's co-authors include Amir Pelleg, Richard C. Dart, Steven A. Seifert, Leslie Boyer, David Löwenthal, Suzanne Ward, Craig S. Kitchens, Patrick E. McKinney, Steven C. Curry and Jude McNally and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American College of Cardiology, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition and Macromolecules.

In The Last Decade

R. Stephen Porter

25 papers receiving 577 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
R. Stephen Porter 188 145 136 82 74 29 623
Jason B. Hack 92 0.5× 41 0.3× 51 0.4× 61 0.7× 54 0.7× 52 563
Saralyn R. Williams 187 1.0× 35 0.2× 144 1.1× 82 1.0× 58 0.8× 50 784
P. Harry 154 0.8× 22 0.2× 119 0.9× 76 0.9× 64 0.9× 50 607
Miriam Hurst 24 0.1× 41 0.3× 55 0.4× 94 1.1× 112 1.5× 21 692
Gabriella Baldi 35 0.2× 179 1.2× 16 0.1× 135 1.6× 32 0.4× 27 578
Brian L. Lloyd 55 0.3× 260 1.8× 11 0.1× 173 2.1× 59 0.8× 36 706
Joan Albert Arnáiz 30 0.2× 67 0.5× 116 0.9× 115 1.4× 15 0.2× 35 615
Martín Jc 17 0.1× 130 0.9× 100 0.7× 60 0.7× 31 0.4× 55 762
William H. Richardson 226 1.2× 19 0.1× 168 1.2× 52 0.6× 111 1.5× 28 626
Roy J. Kim 76 0.4× 36 0.2× 44 0.3× 196 2.4× 28 0.4× 16 704

Countries citing papers authored by R. Stephen Porter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. Stephen Porter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Stephen Porter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Stephen Porter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. Stephen Porter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Stephen Porter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Stephen Porter. The network helps show where R. Stephen Porter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. Stephen Porter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. Stephen Porter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. Stephen Porter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. Stephen Porter. R. Stephen Porter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026