William Stanton

466 total citations
12 papers, 273 citations indexed

About

William Stanton is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Ecology and Archeology. According to data from OpenAlex, William Stanton has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 273 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in History and Philosophy of Science, 2 papers in Ecology and 2 papers in Archeology. Recurrent topics in William Stanton's work include History of Science and Natural History (2 papers), Polar Research and Ecology (2 papers) and Maritime and Coastal Archaeology (2 papers). William Stanton is often cited by papers focused on History of Science and Natural History (2 papers), Polar Research and Ecology (2 papers) and Maritime and Coastal Archaeology (2 papers). William Stanton collaborates with scholars based in United States and Canada. William Stanton's co-authors include Ashley Montagu, David F. Long, James S. Dunbar, Christina L. Kwapich, Wälter R. Tschinkel, W.J. Rink, Hamilton Cravens and Éric Brian and has published in prestigious journals such as The American Historical Review, Journal of Archaeological Science and Journal of American History.

In The Last Decade

William Stanton

10 papers receiving 175 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
William Stanton United States	8	66	50	39	36	30	12	273
Loren C. Eiseley United States	11	76 1.2×	38 0.8×	14 0.4×	44 1.2×	18 0.6×	45	482
J. C. Beaglehole Switzerland	8	55 0.8×	11 0.2×	16 0.4×	88 2.4×	35 1.2×	25	390
David Quammen United States	6	46 0.7×	30 0.6×	11 0.3×	22 0.6×	9 0.3×	29	302
Fa‐ti Fan United States	11	147 2.2×	20 0.4×	21 0.5×	56 1.6×	27 0.9×	32	419
Charles W. Arnade United States	7	43 0.7×	15 0.3×	38 1.0×	58 1.6×	28 0.9×	63	282
Peder Anker Norway	11	108 1.6×	12 0.2×	12 0.3×	22 0.6×	18 0.6×	41	362
Dorothy Middleton United States	8	70 1.1×	10 0.2×	10 0.3×	119 3.3×	31 1.0×	58	321
Peter C. Kjærgaard Denmark	9	42 0.6×	41 0.8×	30 0.8×	77 2.1×	9 0.3×	28	265
Glyn Daniel United States	10	32 0.5×	12 0.2×	24 0.6×	139 3.9×	29 1.0×	51	494
Ronald Rainger United States	10	28 0.4×	31 0.6×	8 0.2×	46 1.3×	32 1.1×	27	402

Countries citing papers authored by William Stanton

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Stanton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Stanton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Stanton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Stanton

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Stanton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Stanton. The network helps show where William Stanton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Stanton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Stanton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Stanton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Stanton. William Stanton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

12 of 12 papers shown

1.

Rink, W.J., et al.. (2012). Subterranean transport and deposition of quartz by ants in sandy sites relevant to age overestimation in optical luminescence dating. Journal of Archaeological Science. 40(4). 2217–2226. 57 indexed citations

2.

Stanton, William. (2007). The Triad Society Or, Heaven And Earth Association. 4 indexed citations

3.

Brian, Éric & William Stanton. (2005). Histoire des populations et histoire des savoirs demographiques. Population. 60(5/6). 839–839. 2 indexed citations

4.

Stanton, William. (2004). The Rapid Growth of Human Populations 1750-2000: Histories, Consequences, Issues, Nation by Nation. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 2 indexed citations

5.

Stanton, William, et al.. (1998). Theology of Authorship?. 17(1). 21–37.

6.

Stanton, William, et al.. (1988). Pseudo-Science and Society in Nineteenth-Century America. Journal of American History. 75(3). 975–975. 14 indexed citations

7.

Stanton, William & Hamilton Cravens. (1979). The Triumph of Evolution: American Scientists and the Heredity-Environment Controversy, 1900-1941. Journal of American History. 66(3). 694–694. 14 indexed citations

8.

Stanton, William, et al.. (1976). The Great United States Exploring Expedition of 1838-1842. Journal of American History. 63(2). 410–410. 9 indexed citations

9.

Long, David F. & William Stanton. (1976). The Great United States Exploring Expedition of 1838-1842. The American Historical Review. 81(5). 1242–1242. 28 indexed citations

10.

Stanton, William, et al.. (1964). Matthew Fontaine Maury: Scientist of the Sea. The American Historical Review. 69(4). 1084–1084. 16 indexed citations

11.

Stanton, William. (1960). The leopard's spots. 20 indexed citations

12.

Montagu, Ashley & William Stanton. (1960). The Leopard's Spots: Scientific Attitudes Toward Race in America, 1815-59.. The Journal of Southern History. 26(3). 384–384. 107 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact