Loren C. Eiseley
- History and Philosophy of Science top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Anthropology top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Genetics
- Co-authors
- A. L. KroeberFrancis DarwinCharles DarwinSol TaxĬrving RouseC. F. VoegelinWilson D. WallisThomas C. Cochran
- Topics
- Evolution and Science Education (3 papers)Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (2 papers)Indigenous Studies and Ecology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Loren C. Eiseley
36 papers receiving 317 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
- History and Philosophy of Science 99
- Sociology and Political Science 76
- Anthropology 44
- Social Psychology 41
- Genetics 38
Countries citing papers authored by Loren C. Eiseley
This map shows the geographic impact of Loren C. Eiseley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Loren C. Eiseley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Loren C. Eiseley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Loren C. Eiseley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Loren C. Eiseley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Loren C. Eiseley. The network helps show where Loren C. Eiseley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Loren C. Eiseley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Loren C. Eiseley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Loren C. Eiseley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Loren C. Eiseley. Loren C. Eiseley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | Darwin And The Mysterious Mr. X: New Light On The Evolutionists | 11 |
| 3 | The Shape of likelihood: Relevance and the university | 1 |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | PANEL DISCUSSION--MIRROR TO MAN: MAN'S ADAPTATION TO HIS EXPANDING ENVIRONMENT. | 0 |
| 7 | The Unexpected Universe | 13 |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | Francis Bacon and the modern dilemma | 2 |
| 12 | The Immense Journey | 42 |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 14 | |
| 18 | 16 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Loren C. Eiseley
Loren C. Eiseley is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Business and International Management and Anthropology, having authored 45 papers that have together received 482 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolution and Science Education (3 papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (2 papers) and Indigenous Studies and Ecology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (99 citations), General Psychology (12 citations) and Archeology (5 citations). Loren C. Eiseley has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include A. L. Kroeber, Francis Darwin, Charles Darwin, Sol Tax, Ĭrving Rouse, C. F. Voegelin, Wilson D. Wallis, Thomas C. Cochran, Howard Mumford Jones and Henry David Thoreau. Their work appears in journals such as Science, American Sociological Review and Scientific American.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.