Peder Anker

842 total citations
41 papers, 362 citations indexed

About

Peder Anker is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Anthropology. According to data from OpenAlex, Peder Anker has authored 41 papers receiving a total of 362 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in History and Philosophy of Science, 6 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 6 papers in Anthropology. Recurrent topics in Peder Anker's work include History of Science and Natural History (8 papers), History of Science and Medicine (7 papers) and Environmental Philosophy and Ethics (6 papers). Peder Anker is often cited by papers focused on History of Science and Natural History (8 papers), History of Science and Medicine (7 papers) and Environmental Philosophy and Ethics (6 papers). Peder Anker collaborates with scholars based in Norway, United States and Switzerland. Peder Anker's co-authors include Nina Witoszek, Nick Hopwood, Warwick Anderson, Staffan Müller‐Wille, Erik Thorud, O. P. F. Clausen, Lynn K. Nyhart, Rolf Bjerknes, Shigehisa Kuriyama and Janet Browne and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Climatic Change and The American Historical Review.

In The Last Decade

Peder Anker

30 papers receiving 305 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Peder Anker Norway 11 108 60 53 42 37 41 362
Deborah R. Coen United States 12 177 1.6× 58 1.0× 79 1.5× 109 2.6× 13 0.4× 29 439
Douglas M. Peers Canada 10 187 1.7× 55 0.9× 63 1.2× 29 0.7× 17 0.5× 25 463
Emily O’Gorman Australia 10 128 1.2× 160 2.7× 47 0.9× 25 0.6× 49 1.3× 29 421
Patrick Curry United Kingdom 10 109 1.0× 35 0.6× 70 1.3× 10 0.2× 84 2.3× 36 371
James Beattie New Zealand 12 105 1.0× 32 0.5× 26 0.5× 73 1.7× 10 0.3× 54 356
Douglas R. Weiner United States 11 238 2.2× 46 0.8× 67 1.3× 38 0.9× 41 1.1× 28 549
Augustin Berque France 12 348 3.2× 79 1.3× 56 1.1× 10 0.2× 54 1.5× 138 643
S. Ravi Rajan United States 8 160 1.5× 26 0.4× 57 1.1× 81 1.9× 13 0.4× 13 406
Catherine Larrère France 10 364 3.4× 43 0.7× 103 1.9× 30 0.7× 60 1.6× 70 648
Heather Anne Swanson Denmark 11 143 1.3× 250 4.2× 46 0.9× 11 0.3× 41 1.1× 24 542

Countries citing papers authored by Peder Anker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peder Anker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peder Anker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peder Anker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peder Anker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peder Anker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peder Anker. The network helps show where Peder Anker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peder Anker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peder Anker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peder Anker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peder Anker. Peder Anker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Anker, Peder. (2022). . Directory of Open access Books (OAPEN Foundation). 12 indexed citations
2.
Hopwood, Nick, Staffan Müller‐Wille, Janet Browne, et al.. (2021). Cycles and circulation: a theme in the history of biology and medicine. History & Philosophy of the Life Sciences. 43(3). 89–89. 8 indexed citations
3.
Anker, Peder. (2020). The Power of the Periphery: How Norway Became an Environmental Pioneer for the World. Faculty Digital Archive (New York University Florence). 2 indexed citations
5.
Anker, Peder. (2018). Rohan Deb Roy. Malarial Subjects: Empire, Medicine and Nonhumans in British India, 1820–1909.. The American Historical Review. 124(1). 229–230. 1 indexed citations
6.
Anker, Peder. (2014). The Gaia Hypothesis: Science on a Pagan Planet - by Michael Ruse. Centaurus. 56(2). 123–124. 1 indexed citations
9.
Anker, Peder. (2009). Imperial Ecology. Harvard University Press eBooks. 7 indexed citations
10.
Anker, Peder. (2008). Deep Ecology in Bucharest. 24(1). 2 indexed citations
11.
Anker, Peder. (2008). Seeing Pink: The Eco-Art of Simon Starling. Journal of Visual Art Practice. 7(1). 3–9.
12.
Anker, Peder. (2007). Graphic Language: Herbert Bayer's Environmental Design. Environmental History. 12(2). 254–279. 3 indexed citations
13.
Anker, Peder. (2007). Science as a Vacation: A History of Ecology in Norway. History of Science. 45(4). 455–479. 11 indexed citations
14.
Anker, Peder. (2006). Science in culture: Bauhaus at the zoo. Nature. 439(7079). 916–916. 5 indexed citations
15.
Anker, Peder. (2005). The economy of nature in the botany of Nehemiah Grew (1641–1712). Archives of Natural History. 31(2). 191–207. 1 indexed citations
16.
Anker, Peder. (2004). The economy of nature in the botany of Nehemiah Grew (1641–1712). Archives of Natural History. 31(2). 191–207. 6 indexed citations
19.
Anker, Peder. (2002). The Context of Ecosystem Theory. Ecosystems. 5(7). 611–613. 13 indexed citations
20.
Anker, Peder. (2001). Imperial Ecology. Harvard University Press eBooks. 71 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026