Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within
it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.
The Complete Works of Aristotle the Revised Oxford Translation
1984876 citationsWilliam Smith, Ross et al.Princeton University Press eBooksprofile →
This map shows the geographic impact of William Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Smith more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Smith. The network helps show where William Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Smith.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Smith based on the total number of citations
received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Smith. William Smith is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
William Smith is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Health and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, having authored 7 papers that have together received 923 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (1 paper), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (1 paper) and Classical Philosophy and Thought (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (380 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (107 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (136 citations). William Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Ross, Marek S. Kopacz and William J. Barnes. Their work appears in journals such as SAGE Open, Journal of Special Operations Medicine and Princeton University Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.