William Sangster

692 total citations
20 papers, 503 citations indexed

About

William Sangster is a scholar working on Surgery, Infectious Diseases and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, William Sangster has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 503 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Surgery, 6 papers in Infectious Diseases and 5 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in William Sangster's work include Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (6 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (4 papers) and Inflammatory Bowel Disease (4 papers). William Sangster is often cited by papers focused on Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (6 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (4 papers) and Inflammatory Bowel Disease (4 papers). William Sangster collaborates with scholars based in United States and India. William Sangster's co-authors include Ben L. Bachulis, David B. Stewart, John P. Hegarty, William B. Long, Lee L. Swanström, T. David Tarity, Javad Parvizi, Tara M. Connelly, Camilo Restrepo and Leonard Harris and has published in prestigious journals such as Frontiers in Microbiology, The American Journal of Surgery and Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

In The Last Decade

William Sangster

20 papers receiving 486 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
William Sangster United States 12 214 108 97 84 81 20 503
C.-W. Ko United States 11 259 1.2× 62 0.6× 76 0.8× 30 0.4× 77 1.0× 15 600
Roy A. Pizzarello United States 13 141 0.7× 71 0.7× 125 1.3× 34 0.4× 77 1.0× 24 633
Reha Artan Türkiye 14 207 1.0× 36 0.3× 116 1.2× 72 0.9× 19 0.2× 62 599
Ziba Mosayebi Iran 12 73 0.3× 15 0.1× 136 1.4× 21 0.3× 123 1.5× 54 449
Jeffrey A. Biller United States 10 296 1.4× 93 0.9× 146 1.5× 132 1.6× 11 0.1× 21 684
E Q Archampong Ghana 12 215 1.0× 63 0.6× 37 0.4× 42 0.5× 23 0.3× 29 429
Fry De United States 11 250 1.2× 149 1.4× 139 1.4× 30 0.4× 30 0.4× 49 599
Christos Tzivinikos United Kingdom 9 197 0.9× 30 0.3× 83 0.9× 52 0.6× 25 0.3× 34 404
Şirin Güven Türkiye 13 124 0.6× 114 1.1× 26 0.3× 70 0.8× 25 0.3× 43 447
R Crane United Kingdom 6 85 0.4× 131 1.2× 112 1.2× 163 1.9× 21 0.3× 11 621

Countries citing papers authored by William Sangster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Sangster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Sangster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Sangster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Sangster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Sangster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Sangster. The network helps show where William Sangster may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Sangster

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Sangster. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Sangster based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Sangster. William Sangster is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ogilvie, James W., Rohin Mittal, William Sangster, et al.. (2023). Preoperative Immuno-Nutrition and Complications After Colorectal Surgery: Results of a 2-Year Prospective Study. Journal of Surgical Research. 289. 182–189. 2 indexed citations
2.
Berg, Arthur, William Sangster, Kathleen M. Schieffer, et al.. (2016). Combined Medical and Surgical Approach Improves Healing of Septic Perianal Crohn's Disease. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 223(3). 506–514e1. 11 indexed citations
3.
Hegarty, John P., et al.. (2016). Induction and Purification of C. difficile Phage Tail-Like Particles. Methods in molecular biology. 1476. 167–175. 4 indexed citations
4.
Sangster, William, John P. Hegarty, Kathleen M. Schieffer, et al.. (2016). Bacterial and Fungal Microbiota Changes Distinguish C. difficile Infection from Other Forms of Diarrhea: Results of a Prospective Inpatient Study. Frontiers in Microbiology. 7. 789–789. 62 indexed citations
5.
Sangster, William, Arthur Berg, Tara M. Connelly, et al.. (2016). Outcomes of early ileocolectomy after percutaneous drainage for perforated ileocolic Crohn's disease. The American Journal of Surgery. 212(4). 728–734. 4 indexed citations
6.
Sangster, William, Evangelos Messaris, Arthur Berg, & David B. Stewart. (2015). Single-Site Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Provides Similar Clinical Outcomes Compared With Standard Laparoscopic Surgery. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 58(9). 862–869. 1 indexed citations
7.
Kulaylat, Afif N., et al.. (2015). Impact of smoking on the surgical outcome of Crohn's disease: a propensity‐score matched National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis. Colorectal Disease. 17(10). 891–902. 18 indexed citations
8.
Hegarty, John P., William Sangster, Leonard Harris, & David B. Stewart. (2014). Proton pump inhibitors induce changes in colonocyte gene expression that may affect Clostridium difficile infection. Surgery. 156(4). 972–978. 29 indexed citations
9.
10.
Sangster, William, John P. Hegarty, & David B. Stewart. (2014). Phage tail-like particles kill Clostridium difficile and represent an alternative to conventional antibiotics. Surgery. 157(1). 96–103. 20 indexed citations
11.
Connelly, Tara M., Ryan M. Juza, William Sangster, et al.. (2014). Volumetric Fat Ratio and Not Body Mass Index Is Predictive of Ileocolectomy Outcomes in Crohn's Disease Patients. Digestive Surgery. 31(3). 219–224. 50 indexed citations
12.
Sangster, William, John P. Hegarty, & David B. Stewart. (2014). Phage therapy for Clostridium difficile infection: An alternative to antibiotics?. Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery. 25(3). 167–170. 8 indexed citations
13.
Sangster, William, Afif N. Kulaylat, David B. Stewart, et al.. (2014). Hernia incidence following single‐site vs standard laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Colorectal Disease. 17(3). 250–256. 12 indexed citations
14.
Restrepo, Camilo, et al.. (2011). Predictors of Intensive Care Unit Admission After Total Joint Arthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 27(5). 720–725. 59 indexed citations
15.
Sangster, William & Timothy B. Patrick. (2002). Talking about Medical Errors: The Void in Existing Controlled Terminologies.. PubMed Central. 1152–1152. 3 indexed citations
16.
Sangster, William & Lee L. Swanström. (1993). Laparoscopic-guided feeding jejunostomy. Surgical Endoscopy. 7(4). 308–310. 28 indexed citations
17.
Sangster, William, et al.. (1992). Biliary complications related to laparoscopic cholecystectomies: radiologic diagnosis and management.. PubMed. 2(4). 279–86. 12 indexed citations
18.
Bachulis, Ben L., et al.. (1988). Patterns of injury in helmeted and nonhelmeted motorcyclists. The American Journal of Surgery. 155(5). 708–711. 93 indexed citations
19.
Sangster, William, et al.. (1988). Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. The American Journal of Surgery. 155(5). 677–679. 61 indexed citations
20.
Chu, Wai Kit & William Sangster. (1987). Potential impacts of MRI accidents.. PubMed. 58(2). 139–41. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026