William S. Spicer
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 10%
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis top 10%
- Physiology
- Complementary and alternative medicine top 10%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Topics
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (3 papers)Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery (2 papers)Climate Change and Health Impacts (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Pulmonary and Respiratory MedicineComplementary and alternative medicineHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
- Journals
- Journal of Applied PhysiologyArchives of Environmental Health An International JournalPubMed
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
William S. Spicer
13 papers receiving 316 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 235
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 73
- Physiology 63
- Complementary and alternative medicine 53
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 43
Countries citing papers authored by William S. Spicer
This map shows the geographic impact of William S. Spicer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William S. Spicer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William S. Spicer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William S. Spicer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William S. Spicer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William S. Spicer. The network helps show where William S. Spicer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William S. Spicer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William S. Spicer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William S. Spicer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William S. Spicer. William S. Spicer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | 47 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 26 | |
| 6 | 25 | |
| 7 | 24 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 44 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 178 |
About William S. Spicer
William S. Spicer is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Otorhinolaryngology and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, having authored 13 papers that have together received 384 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (3 papers), Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery (2 papers) and Climate Change and Health Impacts (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (235 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (53 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (73 citations). William S. Spicer has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert Förster, Robert L. Johnson, J. M. Bishop, H. David Kerr and Richard C. Reba. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Physiology, Archives of Environmental Health An International Journal and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.