William S. Lacey
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Plant Science top 10%
- Paleontology top 5%
- Atmospheric Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Kenneth W. JoyA. J. WillisN. T. MirovLawrence C. MattenE. M. van Zinderen BakkerWilliam G. ChalonerDonald A. EggertDianne Edwards
- Topics
- Plant Diversity and Evolution (14 papers)Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (8 papers)Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils (5 papers)
- Journals
- NatureJournal of EcologyBiological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
William S. Lacey
21 papers receiving 721 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 601
- Molecular Biology 277
- Plant Science 262
- Paleontology 174
- Atmospheric Science 136
Countries citing papers authored by William S. Lacey
This map shows the geographic impact of William S. Lacey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William S. Lacey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William S. Lacey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William S. Lacey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William S. Lacey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William S. Lacey. The network helps show where William S. Lacey may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William S. Lacey
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William S. Lacey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William S. Lacey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William S. Lacey. William S. Lacey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 22 | |
| 4 | 16 | |
| 5 | 39 | |
| 6 | 41 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | Discovery of one of the oldest gymnosperm floras containing cupulate seeds | 15 |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 29 | |
| 12 | 158 | |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | 13 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | A Rapid Cellulose Peel Technique in Palaeobotanybreakdown → | 317 |
| 19 | 46 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About William S. Lacey
William S. Lacey is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Paleontology and Forestry, having authored 23 papers that have together received 824 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Diversity and Evolution (14 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (8 papers) and Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (601 citations), Paleontology (174 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (97 citations). William S. Lacey has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Kenneth W. Joy, A. J. Willis, N. T. Mirov, Lawrence C. Matten, E. M. van Zinderen Bakker, William G. Chaloner, Donald A. Eggert, Dianne Edwards, J. M. Pettitt and Harlan P. Banks. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Journal of Ecology and Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.