William Riley Parker
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- History top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations
- Sociology and Political Science
- Language and Linguistics top 10%
- Co-authors
- John T. ShawcrossScott C. Martin
- Topics
- Second Language Learning and Teaching (4 papers)EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (3 papers)Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers)
- Journals
- Modern Language JournalAmerican Journal of Health-System PharmacyCanadian Modern Language Review/ La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
William Riley Parker
19 papers receiving 94 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Literature and Literary Theory 54
- History 32
- Political Science and International Relations 30
- Sociology and Political Science 28
- Language and Linguistics 24
Countries citing papers authored by William Riley Parker
This map shows the geographic impact of William Riley Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Riley Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Riley Parker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Riley Parker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Riley Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Riley Parker. The network helps show where William Riley Parker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Riley Parker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Riley Parker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Riley Parker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Riley Parker. William Riley Parker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 39 | |
| 7 | The Uralic and Altaic program of the American Council of Learned Societies (1959-1965) | 0 |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | The lives of the most famous English poets (1687) | 11 |
| 10 | The national interest and foreign languages : a discussion guide | 0 |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 0 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About William Riley Parker
William Riley Parker is a scholar working on Chemical Health and Safety, Language and Linguistics and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 28 papers that have together received 163 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Second Language Learning and Teaching (4 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (3 papers) and Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (54 citations), History (32 citations) and Classics (10 citations). William Riley Parker has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include John T. Shawcross and Scott C. Martin. Their work appears in journals such as Modern Language Journal, American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy and Canadian Modern Language Review/ La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.