William R. Schroeder

1.8k citations
43 papers · 1.3k indexed · h-index 16

William R. Schroeder

37 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

William R. Schroeder
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 235
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 192
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 208
  • Plant Science 580
  • Global and Planetary Change 271
Replace Osamu Ueno with:
Osamu Ueno Japan
Zeping Jiang China
Kishwar Ali Pakistan
Guoying Zhou China
Meizhen Liu China
Tom W. N. Walker Switzerland
Almaz Borjigidai China
Qiuying Tian China
Rong Yu China
William R. Schroeder relative to Osamu Ueno Japan Osamu Ueno's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Osamu Ueno · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William R. Schroeder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William R. Schroeder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William R. Schroeder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William R. Schroeder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William R. Schroeder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William R. Schroeder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William R. Schroeder. The network helps show where William R. Schroeder may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William R. Schroeder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William R. Schroeder Line = papers co-authored together William R. Schroeder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20242
2 20223
3 20195
4 20190
5 201537
6 20133
7 201386
8 2012110
9 2011130
10 201082
11 201061
12 2009137
13 200923
14 200312
15 19942
16 198713
17
Genetic improvement of Siberian larch for prairie shelterbelts.
19870
18 1984191
19
Dominick LaCapra and Steven L. Kaplan, eds., "Modern European Intellectual History: Reappraisals and New Perspectives." Reviewed by
19840
20
Sartre and His Predecessors: The Self and the Other
19846

About William R. Schroeder

William R. Schroeder is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Horticulture and Forestry, having authored 43 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bioenergy crop production and management (16 papers), Forest Management and Policy (6 papers), Seedling growth and survival studies (6 papers), Phytochemical and Pharmacological Studies (6 papers), Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (6 papers), Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (5 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (5 papers) and Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (235 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (192 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (208 citations). William R. Schroeder has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Kenya. Frequent co-authors include Salim N. Silim, Thomas S. C. Li, Raju Soolanayakanahally, Robert M. Tate, John E. Repine, Helen Morris, Robert D. Guy, Peter Tiffin, Matthew S. Olson and Shawn D. Mansfield. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Clinical Investigation and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026