William R. Day

527 total citations
18 papers, 71 citations indexed

About

William R. Day is a scholar working on Plant Science, History and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, William R. Day has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 71 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Plant Science, 4 papers in History and 3 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in William R. Day's work include Forest ecology and management (3 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (2 papers) and Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (2 papers). William R. Day is often cited by papers focused on Forest ecology and management (3 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (2 papers) and Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (2 papers). William R. Day collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and Italy. William R. Day's co-authors include Waldemar A. Carlo, Eugene N. Bruce, Steven Robertson, Richard J. Martin, David C. Burr, Zygmunt G. Barański, Theodore J. Cachey, Mirko Tavoni, George Dameron and Ronald L. Martínez and has published in prestigious journals such as Pediatric Research, Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research and Acta Horticulturae.

In The Last Decade

William R. Day

11 papers receiving 56 citations

Peers

William R. Day
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 18
  • Plant Science 18
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 15
  • Ecology 11
  • Cell Biology 9
Replace Charlotte Inchley with:
Charlotte Inchley United Kingdom
Harold W. Jones United Kingdom
Ondřej Rybníček Czechia
Dániel Varga Hungary
Lenka Mészárošová Czechia
Amy Ko Denmark
Richard H. Widmann United States
Maximilian Bastl Austria
B. W. Wells United States
John H. Norton Australia
Charlotte Inchley United Kingdom View profile →
Citations per field, relative to William R. Day
William R. Day · 1×
Citations per year, relative to William R. Day
William R. Day · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by William R. Day

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William R. Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William R. Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William R. Day more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William R. Day

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William R. Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William R. Day. The network helps show where William R. Day may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William R. Day

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William R. Day. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William R. Day based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William R. Day. William R. Day is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 1
2 5
3 0
4 1
5 9
6 2
7 1
8 7
9 10
10 18
11 1
12 4
13 2
14
Some genetic aspects of food utilisation in pigs.
2
15
The influence of pathogenic factors in the rooting space on the development of even-aged plantations.
0
16 7
17 1
18 0

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026