William R. Carter

917 total citations
17 papers, 518 citations indexed

About

William R. Carter is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Philosophy. According to data from OpenAlex, William R. Carter has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 518 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 5 papers in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and 3 papers in Philosophy. Recurrent topics in William R. Carter's work include Diabetes Management and Research (5 papers), Diabetes Management and Education (4 papers) and Philosophy and Theoretical Science (3 papers). William R. Carter is often cited by papers focused on Diabetes Management and Research (5 papers), Diabetes Management and Education (4 papers) and Philosophy and Theoretical Science (3 papers). William R. Carter collaborates with scholars based in United States. William R. Carter's co-authors include William L. Clarke, Linda Gonder‐Frederick, Daniel J. Cox, Mark Heller, Thomas D. Borkovec, Mark C. Johnson, Diana M Julian, Michael Blank, Audrey Irvine and James W. Pennebaker and has published in prestigious journals such as Diabetes Care, Health Psychology and The Philosophical Review.

In The Last Decade

William R. Carter

17 papers receiving 464 citations

Peers

William R. Carter
Eugene I. Burdock United States
Robert O. Cotes United States
Sashank Kaushik United States
Maëlys Touya United States
A. Mignon Belgium
William R. Carter
Citations per year, relative to William R. Carter William R. Carter (= 1×) peers Hung‐Yu Chan

Countries citing papers authored by William R. Carter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William R. Carter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William R. Carter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William R. Carter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William R. Carter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William R. Carter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William R. Carter. The network helps show where William R. Carter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William R. Carter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William R. Carter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William R. Carter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William R. Carter. William R. Carter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Moore, Matthew D., et al.. (2017). Effectiveness of screening for craniosynostosis with ultrasound: a retrospective review. Pediatric Radiology. 47(5). 606–612. 19 indexed citations
2.
Carter, William R., et al.. (2002). On Presentism, Endurance, and Change. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 32(4). 491–510. 15 indexed citations
3.
Carter, William R. & Mark Heller. (1993). The Ontology of Physical Objects.. The Philosophical Review. 102(1). 122–122. 58 indexed citations
4.
Irvine, Audrey, et al.. (1990). Validation of Scale Measuring Environmental Barriers to Diabetes-Regimen Adherence. Diabetes Care. 13(7). 705–711. 54 indexed citations
5.
Gonder‐Frederick, Linda, William R. Carter, Daniel J. Cox, & William L. Clarke. (1990). Environmental stress and blood glucose change in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.. Health Psychology. 9(5). 503–515. 39 indexed citations
6.
Cox, Daniel J., et al.. (1989). Effects and Correlates of Blood Glucose Awareness Training Among Patients With IDDM. Diabetes Care. 12(5). 313–318. 31 indexed citations
7.
Carter, William R.. (1989). How to Change Your Mind. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 19(1). 1–14. 22 indexed citations
8.
Carter, William R. & Mark Heller. (1989). Metaphysical boundaries: A question of independence. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 67(3). 263–276. 1 indexed citations
9.
Carter, William R.. (1989). Elements Of Metaphysics. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 3 indexed citations
10.
Gonder‐Frederick, Linda, Diana M Julian, Daniel J. Cox, William L. Clarke, & William R. Carter. (1988). Self-Measurement of Blood Glucose: Accuracy of Self-Reported Data and Adherence to Recommended Regimen. Diabetes Care. 11(7). 579–585. 59 indexed citations
11.
Clarke, William L., William R. Carter, Mària Moll, et al.. (1988). Metabolic and Cutaneous Events Associated With Hypoglycemia Detected by Sleep Sentry. Diabetes Care. 11(8). 630–635. 10 indexed citations
12.
Carter, William R.. (1987). Contingent Identity and Rigid Designation. Mind. XCVI(382). 250–255. 2 indexed citations
13.
Carter, William R., Mark C. Johnson, & Thomas D. Borkovec. (1986). Worry: An electrocortical analysis. 8(4). 193–204. 63 indexed citations
14.
Cox, Daniel J., William L. Clarke, Linda Gonder‐Frederick, et al.. (1985). Accuracy of Perceiving Blood Glucose in IDDM. Diabetes Care. 8(6). 529–536. 133 indexed citations
15.
Carter, William R.. (1983). Salmon on Artifact Origins and Lost Possibilities. The Philosophical Review. 92(2). 223–223. 3 indexed citations
16.
Carter, William R.. (1983). IN DEFENSE OF UNDETACHED PARTS. Pacific philosophical quarterly. 64(2). 126–143. 4 indexed citations
17.
Carter, William R.. (1972). Locke on feeling another's pain. Philosophical Studies. 23(4). 280–285. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026