William Pavot

15.5k total citations · 3 hit papers
18 papers, 8.3k citations indexed

About

William Pavot is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Applied Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, William Pavot has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 8.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Social Psychology, 8 papers in Applied Psychology and 6 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in William Pavot's work include Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (14 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (6 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (4 papers). William Pavot is often cited by papers focused on Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (14 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (6 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (4 papers). William Pavot collaborates with scholars based in United States and Canada. William Pavot's co-authors include Ed Diener, Ed Diener, Ed Sandvik, C. Randall Colvin, Frank Fujita, Keith B. Magnus, Eunkook M. Suh, Abbott L. Ferriss, M. Joseph Sirgy and Alex C. Michalos and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Personality and Individual Differences and Psychological Assessment.

In The Last Decade

William Pavot

18 papers receiving 7.7k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Review of the Satisfaction With Life Scale.

1993 2.9k citations William Pavot, Ed Diener Psychological Assessment profile →
The Satisfaction With Life Scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction

2008 1.7k citations William Pavot, Ed Diener The Journal of Positive Psychology profile →
Further Validation of the Satisfaction With Life Scale: Evidence for the Cross-Method Convergence of Well-Being Measures

1991 1.3k citations William Pavot, Ed Diener et al. Journal of Personality Assessment profile →

Peers

William Pavot

SP

CP

AP

ECP

SPS

Heidi Smith United States

Robert Biswas‐Diener United States

Lisa G. Aspinwall United States

Charles J. Holahan United States

Tara L. Gruenewald United States

Ronnie Janoff‐Bulman United States

Morris A. Okun United States

George E. Vaillant United States

Carsten Wrosch Canada

Carolyn M. Aldwin United States

Heidi Smith United States

William Pavot

6.5k ×1.4

SP

2.0k ×0.8

CP

1.8k ×1.0

AP

1.8k ×1.1

ECP

2.3k ×1.4

SPS

Citations per year, relative to William Pavot William Pavot (= 1×) peers Heidi Smith

Countries citing papers authored by William Pavot

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Pavot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Pavot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Pavot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Pavot

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Pavot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Pavot. The network helps show where William Pavot may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Pavot

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Pavot. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Pavot based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Pavot. William Pavot is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

18 of 18 papers shown

1.

Pavot, William & Ed Diener. (2013). Happiness Experienced: The Science of Subjective Well-being. Oxford University Press eBooks. 78 indexed citations

2.

Pavot, William. (2013). The Validity and Utility of Global Measures of Subjective Well-Being. Polish Psychological Bulletin. 44(2). 176–184. 7 indexed citations

3.

Pavot, William & Ed Diener. (2008). The Satisfaction With Life Scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology. 3(2). 137–152. 1676 indexed citations breakdown →

4.

Sirgy, M. Joseph, Alex C. Michalos, Abbott L. Ferriss, et al.. (2006). The Quality-of-Life (QOL) Research Movement: Past, Present, and Future. Social Indicators Research. 76(3). 343–466. 254 indexed citations

5.

Pavot, William & Ed Diener. (2004). The subjective evaluation of well-being in adulthood: Findings and implications. Ageing International. 29(2). 113–135. 84 indexed citations

6.

Pavot, William, Ed Diener, & Eunkook M. Suh. (1998). The Temporal Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment. 70(2). 340–354. 259 indexed citations

7.

Pavot, William, Frank Fujita, & Ed Diener. (1997). The relation between self-aspect congruence, personality and subjective well-being. Personality and Individual Differences. 22(2). 183–191. 43 indexed citations

8.

Pavot, William & Ed Diener. (1993). Review of the Satisfaction With Life Scale.. Psychological Assessment. 5(2). 164–172. 218 indexed citations

9.

Pavot, William & Ed Diener. (1993). REVISE OF SATISFACTION WITH LIFE SCALE. 5(2). 164–172. 4 indexed citations

10.

Pavot, William & Ed Diener. (1993). The affective and cognitive context of self-reported measures of subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research. 28(1). 1–20. 423 indexed citations

11.

Pavot, William & Ed Diener. (1993). Review of the Satisfaction With Life Scale.. Psychological Assessment. 5(2). 164–172. 2862 indexed citations breakdown →

12.

Magnus, Keith B., Ed Diener, Frank Fujita, & William Pavot. (1993). Extraversion and neuroticism as predictors of objective life events: A longitudinal analysis.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 65(5). 1046–1053. 379 indexed citations

13.

Diener, Ed, Ed Sandvik, William Pavot, & Frank Fujita. (1992). Extraversion and subjective well-being in a U.S. national probability sample. Journal of Research in Personality. 26(3). 205–215. 117 indexed citations

14.

Pavot, William, Ed Diener, C. Randall Colvin, & Ed Sandvik. (1991). Further Validation of the Satisfaction With Life Scale: Evidence for the Cross-Method Convergence of Well-Being Measures. Journal of Personality Assessment. 57(1). 149–161. 1345 indexed citations breakdown →

15.

Diener, Ed, et al.. (1991). The psychic costs of intense positive affect.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 61(3). 492–503. 8 indexed citations

16.

Diener, Ed, et al.. (1991). The psychic costs of intense positive affect.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 61(3). 492–503. 122 indexed citations

17.

Diener, Ed, Ed Sandvik, William Pavot, & Dennis J. Gallagher. (1991). Response artifacts in the measurement of subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research. 24(1). 35–56. 133 indexed citations

18.

Pavot, William, Ed Diener, & Frank Fujita. (1990). Extraversion and happiness. Personality and Individual Differences. 11(12). 1299–1306. 255 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact