William P. Stephen

520 citations
14 papers · 412 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

William P. Stephen

13 papers receiving 390 citations

Peers

William P. Stephen
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
  • Insect Science 273
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 382
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 118
  • Plant Science 193
  • Genetics 105
Replace John S. Ascher with:
John S. Ascher United States
Francisco Javier Ortiz‐Sánchez Spain
W. W. Page United Kingdom
Agnès Schermann‐Legionnet France
R. J. Hale New Zealand
Sarah K. Gess United States
Kimiora L. Ward United States
Hugues Mouret France
Nancy Davies United Kingdom
Birgit Jauker Germany
William P. Stephen relative to John S. Ascher United States John S. Ascher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
John S. Ascher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William P. Stephen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William P. Stephen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William P. Stephen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William P. Stephen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William P. Stephen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William P. Stephen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William P. Stephen. The network helps show where William P. Stephen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside William P. Stephen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William P. Stephen Line = papers co-authored together William P. Stephen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2005113
2
The biology and external morphology of bees ; with a synopsis of the genera of northwestern America
196971
3 201267
4 200756
5 200935
6 201121
7 200717
8 201111
9 197310
10 20116
11 20153
12
Pollination in Cranberries on the South Oregon Coast: Honeybees
20091
13 19641
14 20070

About William P. Stephen

William P. Stephen is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Plant Science, Genetics and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 14 papers that have together received 412 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (12 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (10 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (6 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (5 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (1 paper), Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (1 paper), Plant pathogens and resistance mechanisms (1 paper) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (273 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (382 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (118 citations), Plant Science (193 citations) and Genetics (105 citations). William P. Stephen has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Sujaya Rao, George E. Bohart, Sandra J. DeBano, Robbin W. Thorp, Oliver Johnson and Alfred Soeldner. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Apicultural Research, Apidologie, HortScience, Nature and Crop Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact