William O. Mitchell
Impact in
- Infectious Diseases top 5%
- Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Microbiology top 5%
Papers in
-
- Antifungal resistance and susceptibility 9
-
- Fungal Infections and Studies 5
- Nail Diseases and Treatments 4
- Co-authors
- H. F. Hasenclever (15 shared papers)Roger M. Cole (2 shared papers)Claude F. Garon (1 shared paper)T J Popkin (1 shared paper)Errol Reiss (1 shared paper)S. H. Stone (1 shared paper)N. Feder (1 shared paper)Donald B. Louria (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Bacteriology (8 papers)Medical Mycology (4 papers)Infection and Immunity (2 papers)The Journal of Immunology (1 paper)Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
William O. Mitchell
18 papers receiving 591 citations
William O. Mitchell's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Infectious Diseases 492
- Microbiology 81
- Epidemiology 304
- Endocrinology 31
- Periodontics 27
Countries citing papers authored by William O. Mitchell
This map shows the geographic impact of William O. Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William O. Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William O. Mitchell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William O. Mitchell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William O. Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William O. Mitchell. The network helps show where William O. Mitchell may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside William O. Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ANTIGENIC STUDIES OF CANDIDA Hit paper breakdown → | 1961 | 235 |
| 2 | 1961 | 59 | |
| 3 | 1961 | 55 | |
| 4 | 1964 | 51 | |
| 5 | 1962 | 41 | |
| 6 | 1964 | 39 | |
| 7 | 1960 | 39 | |
| 8 | 1963 | 39 | |
| 9 | 1980 | 29 | |
| 10 | 1963 | 27 | |
| 11 | 1962 | 27 | |
| 12 | 1963 | 26 | |
| 13 | 1977 | 20 | |
| 14 | 1960 | 19 | |
| 15 | 1974 | 19 | |
| 16 | 1962 | 10 | |
| 17 | 1970 | 8 | |
| 18 | Influence of fungus strain and lapse of time in experimental histoplasmosis and of volume of inoculum in cryptococcosis upon recovery of the fungi. | 1959 | 8 |
About William O. Mitchell
William O. Mitchell is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology, Plant Science, Food Science and Molecular Biology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 751 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antifungal resistance and susceptibility (9 papers), Fungal Infections and Studies (5 papers), Nail Diseases and Treatments (4 papers), Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls (3 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (3 papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (3 papers), Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (2 papers) and Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Infectious Diseases (492 citations), Microbiology (81 citations), Epidemiology (304 citations), Endocrinology (31 citations) and Periodontics (27 citations). William O. Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include H. F. Hasenclever, Roger M. Cole, Claude F. Garon, T J Popkin, Errol Reiss, S. H. Stone, N. Feder, Donald B. Louria and C. W. Emmons. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Bacteriology, Medical Mycology, Infection and Immunity, The Journal of Immunology and Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.