William Mook
Impact in
-
- Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
- Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation
- Nephrology top 10%
- Acute Kidney Injury Research
- Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
Papers in
-
- Frailty in Older Adults 1
- Co-authors
- George L. ArnoldSharon K. InouyeFred H. RubinAlvin ShapiroRobert WeberZiad El KhouryMarilyn RidenourDarrell J. Triulzi
- Journals
- Transfusion (2 papers)Occupational Medicine (2 papers)Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (1 paper)The Diabetes Educator (1 paper)Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
William Mook
14 papers receiving 387 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 137
- Nephrology 79
- Biochemistry 42
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 26
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 32
Countries citing papers authored by William Mook
This map shows the geographic impact of William Mook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Mook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Mook more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Mook
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Mook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Mook. The network helps show where William Mook may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 17 scholars most cited alongside William Mook, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 92 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 13 | |
| 3 | Intravenous nesiritide in acute heart failure. | 2005 | 2 |
| 4 | 2004 | 11 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 33 | |
| 6 | 2002 | 142 | |
| 7 | 1998 | 2 | |
| 8 | 1996 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1995 | 76 | |
| 10 | Fasting hyperglycemia in type I diabetes mellitus. | 1993 | 2 |
| 11 | 1992 | 21 | |
| 12 | 1991 | 5 | |
| 13 | 1952 | 5 | |
| 14 | 1952 | 5 |
About William Mook
William Mook is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Family Practice, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Biochemistry, having authored 14 papers that have together received 410 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Blood transfusion and management (2 papers), Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (2 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (2 papers), Diabetes Treatment and Management (2 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (1 paper), Frailty in Older Adults (1 paper), Neonatal Health and Biochemistry (1 paper) and Medication Adherence and Compliance (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (137 citations), Nephrology (79 citations), Biochemistry (42 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (26 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (32 citations). William Mook has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include George L. Arnold, Sharon K. Inouye, Fred H. Rubin, Alvin Shapiro, Robert Weber, Ziad El Khoury, Marilyn Ridenour, Darrell J. Triulzi, Mark Fung and Nalini Rao. Their work appears in journals such as Transfusion, Occupational Medicine, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, The Diabetes Educator and Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.