William M. J. Best
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Instrumentation top 5%
- Spectroscopy top 10%
- Atmospheric Science
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Co-authors
- Jonathan P. WilliamsMichael C. LiuTrent J. DupuyE. A. MagnierZhoujian ZhangBrendan P. BowlerMark S. MarleyMichael R. Line
- Topics
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (28 papers)Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (21 papers)Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (17 papers)
- Journals
- The Astrophysical JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyAstronomy and Astrophysics
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomFrance
In The Last Decade
William M. J. Best
31 papers receiving 509 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 21
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 592
- Instrumentation 185
- Spectroscopy 127
- Atmospheric Science 68
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 45
Countries citing papers authored by William M. J. Best
This map shows the geographic impact of William M. J. Best's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William M. J. Best with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William M. J. Best more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William M. J. Best
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William M. J. Best. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William M. J. Best. The network helps show where William M. J. Best may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William M. J. Best
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William M. J. Best. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William M. J. Best based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William M. J. Best. William M. J. Best is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | Strongly polarised radio pulses from a new white-dwarf-hosting long-period transient | 2 |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 31 | |
| 11 | 37 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | 37 | |
| 14 | 47 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | 13 | |
| 18 | 21 | |
| 19 | 141 | |
| 20 | 14 |
About William M. J. Best
William M. J. Best is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Spectroscopy, having authored 32 papers that have together received 617 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (28 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (21 papers) and Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (185 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (592 citations) and Spectroscopy (127 citations). William M. J. Best has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan P. Williams, Michael C. Liu, Trent J. Dupuy, E. A. Magnier, Zhoujian Zhang, Brendan P. Bowler, Mark S. Marley, Michael R. Line, Aniket Sanghi and S. K. Leggett. Their work appears in journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and Astronomy and Astrophysics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.