Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Galactic reddening in 3D from stellar photometry – an improved map
2018265 citationsEdward F. Schlafly, Hans‐Walter Rix et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Societyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of P. W. Draper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P. W. Draper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P. W. Draper more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by P. W. Draper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P. W. Draper. The network helps show where P. W. Draper may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of P. W. Draper
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of P. W. Draper.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of P. W. Draper based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with P. W. Draper. P. W. Draper is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Magnier, E. A., K. C. Chambers, H. Flewelling, et al.. (2020). The Pan-STARRS Data-processing System. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 251(1). 3–3.51 indexed citations
4.
Schaller, Matthieu, et al.. (2018). SWIFT: SPH With Inter-dependent Fine-grained Tasking. Astrophysics Source Code Library.17 indexed citations
Draper, P. W., et al.. (2014). SPLAT-VO: Spectral Analysis Tool for the Virtual Observatory. Durham Research Online (Durham University).3 indexed citations
10.
Warren-Smith, R. F., et al.. (2014). CCDPACK: CCD Data Reduction Package. Astrophysics Source Code Library.2 indexed citations
11.
Draper, P. W.. (2014). SPLAT: Spectral Analysis Tool. Durham Research Online (Durham University).4 indexed citations
12.
Draper, P. W., et al.. (2013). SPLAT-VO -- A VO-enabled Spectral Analysis Tool. 243.1 indexed citations
13.
Draper, P. W., et al.. (2011). CCDPACK -- CCD data reduction package. 139.2 indexed citations
14.
Berry, David & P. W. Draper. (2010). Using the AST Library to Create and Use STC-S Region Descriptions. Durham Research Online (Durham University). 434. 213.4 indexed citations
15.
Draper, P. W., David Berry, Tim Jenness, & Frossie Economou. (2009). GAIA -- Version 4. ASPC. 411. 575.4 indexed citations
16.
Draper, P. W., David Berry, Tim Jenness, Frossie Economou, & M. J. Currie. (2008). GAIA-3D: Volume Visualization of Data-Cubes. Durham Research Online (Durham University). 394. 339.1 indexed citations
17.
Draper, P. W.. (1998). New Features in GAIA. 20. 7–9.1 indexed citations
18.
Draper, P. W., et al.. (1997). Multi-band polarimetry of BD +31°643.. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 29(5). 1361.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.