William L. Gentry

442 citations
13 papers · 347 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

William L. Gentry

13 papers receiving 317 citations

Peers

William L. Gentry
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Reproductive Medicine 233
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 67
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 139
  • Immunology 50
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 40
Replace V. Sasse with:
V. Sasse Germany
Naim Abusheikha United Kingdom
J. Stelling United States
Giovanni Retto Italy
Rehan Salim United Kingdom
Howard C. Mezer United States
Fethi Zhioua Tunisia
S.J. Fasouliotis Israel
Erol Tavmergen Türkiye
Nitish Narvekar United Kingdom
William L. Gentry relative to V. Sasse Germany V. Sasse's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
V. Sasse · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William L. Gentry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William L. Gentry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William L. Gentry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William L. Gentry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William L. Gentry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William L. Gentry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William L. Gentry. The network helps show where William L. Gentry may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside William L. Gentry, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William L. Gentry Line = papers co-authored together William L. Gentry links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2005172
2 199448
3 199135
4 200929
5 199520
6 199311
7 19899
8
Use of endometrial measurement as an exclusion criterion for in vitro fertilization using clomiphene citrate.
19965
9 19915
10 19894
11 19894
12 20073
13 19952

About William L. Gentry

William L. Gentry is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Reproductive Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Immunology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 347 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Biology and Fertility (8 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (4 papers), Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management (3 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (2 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (2 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (2 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (2 papers) and Reproductive System and Pregnancy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (233 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (67 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (139 citations), Immunology (50 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (40 citations). William L. Gentry has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Stephen D. Rubin, Serdar E. Bulun, Michael Wolf, John E. Buster, Michael Henry, Carole C. Wegner, E.S. Critser, John K. Critser, Sandra Ann Carson and Carolyn B. Coulam. Their work appears in journals such as Fertility and Sterility, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, American Journal of Reproductive Immunology and Human Reproduction.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact