William L. Fink

7.5k total citations · 3 hit papers
59 papers, 5.7k citations indexed

About

William L. Fink is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Paleontology and Aquatic Science. According to data from OpenAlex, William L. Fink has authored 59 papers receiving a total of 5.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 22 papers in Paleontology and 21 papers in Aquatic Science. Recurrent topics in William L. Fink's work include Fish biology, ecology, and behavior (21 papers), Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (18 papers) and Evolution and Paleontology Studies (18 papers). William L. Fink is often cited by papers focused on Fish biology, ecology, and behavior (21 papers), Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (18 papers) and Evolution and Paleontology Studies (18 papers). William L. Fink collaborates with scholars based in United States, Norway and Austria. William L. Fink's co-authors include Miriam Leah Zelditch, Donald L. Swiderski, H. David Sheets, Sara V. Fink, Stanley H. Weitzman, Elliott Sober, E. O. Wiley, James S. Albert, H. J. Fyhn and Bonnie J. Davis and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

In The Last Decade

William L. Fink

56 papers receiving 5.3k citations

Hit Papers

Geometric morphometrics for biologists: a... 1981 2026 1996 2011 2004 1981 1984 500 1000 1.5k 2.0k 2.5k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
William L. Fink United States 25 2.1k 2.0k 1.7k 1.3k 1.1k 59 5.7k
Miriam Leah Zelditch United States 35 1.1k 0.5× 3.5k 1.7× 2.7k 1.6× 390 0.3× 1.4k 1.3× 75 5.9k
Leslie F. Marcus United States 21 648 0.3× 2.1k 1.0× 1.4k 0.8× 339 0.3× 931 0.9× 42 3.8k
H. David Sheets United States 23 812 0.4× 2.3k 1.1× 2.1k 1.2× 335 0.2× 1.1k 1.0× 70 4.9k
A. Richard Palmer Canada 42 1.1k 0.5× 2.3k 1.1× 794 0.5× 327 0.2× 2.5k 2.3× 95 7.4k
Gavin J. P. Naylor United States 32 2.6k 1.2× 506 0.2× 940 0.5× 1.1k 0.8× 1.1k 1.0× 134 4.8k
Michael L. Collyer United States 26 932 0.4× 1.6k 0.8× 1.5k 0.9× 198 0.1× 1.2k 1.1× 43 3.8k
Marta Barluenga Spain 19 922 0.4× 849 0.4× 425 0.2× 461 0.3× 688 0.6× 42 2.6k
Marcelo R. Sánchez‐Villagra Switzerland 47 1.8k 0.9× 1.4k 0.7× 4.9k 2.9× 177 0.1× 1.8k 1.7× 261 7.3k
Pere Alberch United States 29 831 0.4× 916 0.4× 1.4k 0.8× 129 0.1× 846 0.8× 53 5.9k
R. Craig Albertson United States 33 1.4k 0.7× 780 0.4× 717 0.4× 710 0.5× 817 0.8× 98 4.0k

Countries citing papers authored by William L. Fink

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William L. Fink's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William L. Fink with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William L. Fink more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William L. Fink

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William L. Fink. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William L. Fink. The network helps show where William L. Fink may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William L. Fink

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William L. Fink. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William L. Fink based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William L. Fink. William L. Fink is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Zelditch, Miriam Leah, Donald L. Swiderski, H. David Sheets, & William L. Fink. (2004). Geometric morphometrics for biologists: a primer. Elsevier eBooks. 2684 indexed citations breakdown →
2.
Zelditch, Miriam Leah, H. David Sheets, & William L. Fink. (2003). The ontogenetic dynamics of shape disparity. Paleobiology. 29(1). 139–156. 124 indexed citations
3.
Swiderski, Donald L., Miriam Leah Zelditch, & William L. Fink. (2000). Phylogenetic analysis of skull shape evolution in marmotine squirrels using landmarks and thin-plate splines. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 15 indexed citations
4.
Zelditch, Miriam Leah, H. David Sheets, & William L. Fink. (2000). SPATIOTEMPORAL REORGANIZATION OF GROWTH RATES IN THE EVOLUTION OF ONTOGENY. Evolution. 54(4). 1363–1371. 79 indexed citations
5.
Swiderski, Donald L., Miriam Leah Zelditch, & William L. Fink. (1998). Why morphometrics is not special: coding quantitative data for phylogenetic analysis.. PubMed. 47(3). 508–19. 52 indexed citations
6.
Reis, Roberto Esser dos, Miriam Leah Zelditch, & William L. Fink. (1998). Ontogenetic Allometry of Body Shape in the Neotropical Catfish Callichthys (Teleostei: Siluriformes). Copeia. 1998(1). 177–177. 18 indexed citations
7.
Fink, William L. & Miriam Leah Zelditch. (1997). Shape Analysis and Taxonomic Status of Pygocentrus Piranhas (Ostariophysi, Characiformes) from the Paraguay and Paraná River Basins of South America. Copeia. 1997(1). 179–179. 12 indexed citations
8.
Zelditch, Miriam Leah & William L. Fink. (1996). Heterochrony and heterotopy: stability and innovation in the evolution of form. Paleobiology. 22(2). 241–254. 92 indexed citations
9.
Zelditch, Miriam Leah, William L. Fink, & Donald L. Swiderski. (1995). Morphometrics, Homology, and Phylogenetics: Quantified Characters as Synapomorphies. Systematic Biology. 44(2). 179–189. 95 indexed citations
10.
Zelditch, Miriam Leah & William L. Fink. (1995). Allometry and developmental integration of body growth in a piranha, Pygocentrus nattereri (Teleostei: Ostariophysi). Journal of Morphology. 223(3). 341–355. 60 indexed citations
11.
Fink, William L., et al.. (1989). Revision del genero serrasalmus lacepede, 1803 y generos relacionados en venezuela: i. Notas sobre la morfologia y sistematica de pristobrycon striolatus (steindachner, 1908). 12. 140–171. 6 indexed citations
13.
Fink, William L.. (1982). The conceptual relationship between ontogeny and phylogeny. Paleobiology. 8(3). 254–264. 221 indexed citations
14.
Lammer, Jan, Roberto Nicoletti, G. F. Fueger, & William L. Fink. (1982). Osteoscintimetry ? A method of semiquantitative evaluation of skeletal scintigrams by use of profiles and a macro function for computer processing. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 7(8). 364–9. 4 indexed citations
16.
Fink, William L.. (1981). Ontogeny and phylogeny of tooth attachment modes in actinopterygian fishes. Journal of Morphology. 167(2). 167–184. 116 indexed citations
17.
Fink, William L.. (1979). A new species of Moenkhausia from the Mato Grosso region of Brazil (Pisces: Characidae). 450. 1–12. 19 indexed citations
18.
Fink, William L. & E. O. Wiley. (1979). Cladism defended. Nature. 280(5723). 542–542. 3 indexed citations
19.
Fink, William L.. (1979). Optimal Classifications. Systematic Zoology. 28(3). 371–371. 20 indexed citations
20.
Weitzman, Stanley H. & William L. Fink. (1971). A new species of characid fish of the genus Nematobrycon from the Rio Calima of Colombia (Pisces, Characoidei, Characidae). Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 19(248). 57–77. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026