William L. Fink
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 0.5%
- Geometry and Topology top 0.1%
- Paleontology top 0.5%
- Aquatic Science top 0.2%
- Ecology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Miriam Leah ZelditchDonald L. SwiderskiH. David SheetsSara V. FinkStanley H. WeitzmanElliott SoberE. O. WileyJames S. Albert
- Topics
- Fish biology, ecology, and behavior (21 papers)Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (18 papers)Evolution and Paleontology Studies (18 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNorwayAustria
In The Last Decade
William L. Fink
56 papers receiving 5.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 170
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 2.1k
- Geometry and Topology 2.0k
- Paleontology 1.7k
- Aquatic Science 1.3k
- Ecology 1.1k
Countries citing papers authored by William L. Fink
This map shows the geographic impact of William L. Fink's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William L. Fink with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William L. Fink more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William L. Fink
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William L. Fink. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William L. Fink. The network helps show where William L. Fink may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William L. Fink
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William L. Fink. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William L. Fink based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William L. Fink. William L. Fink is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Geometric morphometrics for biologists: a primerbreakdown → | 2684 |
| 2 | 124 | |
| 3 | 15 | |
| 4 | 79 | |
| 5 | Why morphometrics is not special: coding quantitative data for phylogenetic analysis. | 52 |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 92 | |
| 8 | 60 | |
| 9 | 95 | |
| 10 | Revision del genero serrasalmus lacepede, 1803 y generos relacionados en venezuela: i. Notas sobre la morfologia y sistematica de pristobrycon striolatus (steindachner, 1908) | 6 |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | 25 | |
| 13 | 75 | |
| 14 | 221 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | 79 | |
| 18 | 116 | |
| 19 | 19 | |
| 20 | A new species of characid fish of the genus Nematobrycon from the Rio Calima of Colombia (Pisces, Characoidei, Characidae) | 1 |
About William L. Fink
William L. Fink is a scholar working on Paleontology, Aquatic Science and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 59 papers that have together received 5.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fish biology, ecology, and behavior (21 papers), Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (18 papers) and Evolution and Paleontology Studies (18 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Paleontology (1.7k citations), Geometry and Topology (2.0k citations) and Aquatic Science (1.3k citations). William L. Fink has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Norway and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Miriam Leah Zelditch, Donald L. Swiderski, H. David Sheets, Sara V. Fink, Stanley H. Weitzman, Elliott Sober, E. O. Wiley, James S. Albert, Bonnie J. Davis and Dennis A. Powers. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.