Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Major Features of Evolution.
19541.5k citationsEverett C. Olson et al.Evolutionprofile →
Morphological Integration
1959406 citationsEverett C. Olson, Robert L. Miller et al.profile →
ATLAS OF PALAEOBIOGEOGRAPHY
1973299 citationsEverett C. OlsonEvolutionprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Everett C. Olson
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Everett C. Olson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Everett C. Olson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Everett C. Olson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Everett C. Olson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Everett C. Olson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Everett C. Olson. The network helps show where Everett C. Olson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Everett C. Olson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Everett C. Olson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Everett C. Olson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Everett C. Olson. Everett C. Olson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Olson, Everett C.. (1990). The Other Side of the Medal: A Paleobiologist Reflects on the Art and Serendipity of Science.1 indexed citations
2.
Olson, Everett C.. (1988). Permo-Triassic vertebrate extinctions: A program. NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration). 673. 137.1 indexed citations
Olson, Everett C.. (1984). The taxonomic status and morphology of Pleuristion brachycoelus Case; referred to Protocaptorhinus pricei Clark and Carroll (Reptilia: Captorhinomorpha). Journal of Paleontology. 58(5). 1282–1295.8 indexed citations
Olson, Everett C.. (1979). Seymouria grandis n. sp. (Batrachosauria; Amphibia) from the middle Clear Fork (Permian) of Oklahoma and Texas. Journal of Paleontology. 53(3). 720–728.12 indexed citations
8.
Olson, Everett C.. (1979). Aspects of the biology of Trimerorhachis (Amphibia, Temnospondyli). Journal of Paleontology. 53(1). 1–17.30 indexed citations
9.
Olson, Everett C., et al.. (1972). Notes on Gnathorhiza (Osteichthyes, Dipnoi). Journal of Paleontology. 46(3). 371–376.14 indexed citations
10.
Olson, Everett C.. (1972). Diplocaulus parvus n. sp. (Amphibia, Nectridea) from the Chickasha Formation (Permian, Guadalupian) of Oklahoma. Journal of Paleontology. 46(5). 656–659.7 indexed citations
11.
Olson, Everett C.. (1971). A skeleton of Lysorophus tricarinatus (Amphibia; lepospondyli) from the Hennessey Formation (Permian) of Oklahoma. Journal of Paleontology. 45(3). 443–449.16 indexed citations
Olson, Everett C. & Robert L. Miller. (1951). RELATIVE GROWTH IN PALEONTOLOGICAL STUDIES. Journal of Paleontology. 25(2). 212–223.20 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.