William Koetzle

1.1k total citations
17 papers, 654 citations indexed

About

William Koetzle is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Economics and Econometrics and Strategy and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, William Koetzle has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 654 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 8 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 5 papers in Strategy and Management. Recurrent topics in William Koetzle's work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (11 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (5 papers) and Social Policy and Reform Studies (4 papers). William Koetzle is often cited by papers focused on Electoral Systems and Political Participation (11 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (5 papers) and Social Policy and Reform Studies (4 papers). William Koetzle collaborates with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. William Koetzle's co-authors include Wayne Sandholtz, Bernard Grofman, Thomas L. Brunell, Robert Huckfeldt, Paul Allen Beck, Russell J. Dalton, Anthony J. McGann, Samuel Merrill, Michael P. McDonald and John DiNardo and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Political Science, The Journal of Politics and International Studies Quarterly.

In The Last Decade

William Koetzle

17 papers receiving 561 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
William Koetzle United States 12 344 331 173 120 95 17 654
Marko Klašnja United States 13 480 1.4× 387 1.2× 195 1.1× 60 0.5× 48 0.5× 24 774
José Antonio Cheibub United States 7 471 1.4× 673 2.0× 185 1.1× 77 0.6× 25 0.3× 9 930
Jim Granato United States 12 282 0.8× 250 0.8× 263 1.5× 65 0.5× 37 0.4× 30 652
Jonathan Krieckhaus United States 11 318 0.9× 257 0.8× 248 1.4× 31 0.3× 114 1.2× 19 613
David Waldner United States 7 545 1.6× 524 1.6× 116 0.7× 101 0.8× 16 0.2× 13 916
Luigi Manzetti United States 12 329 1.0× 243 0.7× 137 0.8× 71 0.6× 36 0.4× 34 544
Rick Stapenhurst Canada 12 286 0.8× 218 0.7× 152 0.9× 59 0.5× 68 0.7× 41 536
Anton Strezhnev United States 9 350 1.0× 341 1.0× 160 0.9× 198 1.6× 46 0.5× 22 852
Brian E. Roberts United States 9 235 0.7× 225 0.7× 244 1.4× 634 5.3× 20 0.2× 23 980
Tae Ho Eom South Korea 10 234 0.7× 260 0.8× 180 1.0× 60 0.5× 76 0.8× 20 600

Countries citing papers authored by William Koetzle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Koetzle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Koetzle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Koetzle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Koetzle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Koetzle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Koetzle. The network helps show where William Koetzle may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Koetzle

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Koetzle. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Koetzle based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Koetzle. William Koetzle is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Grofman, Bernard, William Koetzle, & Anthony J. McGann. (2002). Congressional Leadership 1965–96: A New Look at the Extremism versus Centrality Debate. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 27(1). 87–105. 20 indexed citations
2.
McGann, Anthony J., Bernard Grofman, & William Koetzle. (2002). Why Party Leaders are More Extreme than Their Members: Modeling Sequential Elimination Elections in the U.S. House of Representatives. Public Choice. 113(3-4). 337–356. 10 indexed citations
3.
McGann, Anthony J., William Koetzle, & Bernard Grofman. (2002). How an Ideologically Concentrated Minority Can Trump a Dispersed Majority: Nonmedian Voter Results for Plurality, Run-off, and Sequential Elimination Elections. American Journal of Political Science. 46(1). 134–134. 14 indexed citations
4.
Grofman, Bernard, William Koetzle, & Anthony J. McGann. (2002). Congressional Leadership 1965–96: A New Look at the Extremism versus Centrality Debate. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 27(1). 87–105. 2 indexed citations
5.
Grofman, Bernard, William Koetzle, Samuel Merrill, & Thomas L. Brunell. (2001). Changes in the Location of the Median Voter in theU.S. House of Representatives, 1963–1996. Public Choice. 106(3-4). 221–232. 11 indexed citations
6.
Grofman, Bernard, William Koetzle, Michael P. McDonald, & Thomas L. Brunell. (2000). A New Look at Split-Ticket Outcomes for House and President: The Comparative Midpoints Model. The Journal of Politics. 62(1). 34–50. 29 indexed citations
7.
Sandholtz, Wayne & William Koetzle. (2000). Accounting for Corruption: Economic Structure, Democracy, and Trade. International Studies Quarterly. 44(1). 31–50. 300 indexed citations
8.
Brunell, Thomas L. & William Koetzle. (1999). A Divided-Government-Based Explanation for the Decline in Resignations from the US Senate, 1834-1996. Party Politics. 5(4). 497–505. 1 indexed citations
9.
Grofman, Bernard, Samuel Merrill, Thomas L. Brunell, & William Koetzle. (1999). The Potential Electoral Disadvantages of a Catch-All Party. Party Politics. 5(2). 199–210. 22 indexed citations
10.
Merrill, Samuel, Bernard Grofman, Thomas L. Brunell, & William Koetzle. (1999). The Power of Ideologically Concentrated Minorities. Journal of Theoretical Politics. 11(1). 57–74. 14 indexed citations
11.
Brunell, Thomas L., William Koetzle, John DiNardo, Bernard Grofman, & Scott L. Feld. (1999). The R 2 = .93: Where Then Do They Differ? Comparing Liberal and Conservative Interest Group Ratings. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 24(1). 87–87. 17 indexed citations
12.
Sandholtz, Wayne & William Koetzle. (1998). Accounting for Corruption: Economic Structure, Democratic Norms, and Trade. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 9 indexed citations
13.
Grofman, Bernard, Thomas L. Brunell, & William Koetzle. (1998). Why Gain in the Senate but Midterm Loss in the House? Evidence from a Natural Experiment. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 23(1). 79–79. 12 indexed citations
14.
Koetzle, William. (1998). The Impact of Constituency Diversity upon the Competitiveness of U. S. House Elections, 1962-96. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 23(4). 561–561. 42 indexed citations
15.
Dalton, Russell J., Paul Allen Beck, Robert Huckfeldt, & William Koetzle. (1998). A Test of Media-Centered Agenda Setting: Newspaper Content and Public Interests in a Presidential Election. Political Communication. 15(4). 463–481. 77 indexed citations
16.
Brunell, Thomas L., et al.. (1997). Death, Where Is Thy Sting? The Senate as a Ponce (de Leon) Scheme. PS Political Science & Politics. 30(1). 58–59. 6 indexed citations
17.
Grofman, Bernard, William Koetzle, & Thomas L. Brunell. (1997). An integrated perspective on the three potential sources of partisan bias: Malapportionment, turnout differences, and the geographic distribution of party vote shares. Electoral Studies. 16(4). 457–470. 68 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026