S. Scott Graham

1.0k total citations
56 papers, 576 citations indexed

About

S. Scott Graham is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, S. Scott Graham has authored 56 papers receiving a total of 576 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in General Health Professions, 10 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 10 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in S. Scott Graham's work include Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare (8 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (6 papers) and Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (6 papers). S. Scott Graham is often cited by papers focused on Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare (8 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (6 papers) and Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (6 papers). S. Scott Graham collaborates with scholars based in United States and Canada. S. Scott Graham's co-authors include Carl G. Herndl, William Keith, Sang‐Yeon Kim, Paul A. Jelliss, Justin F. Rousseau, Kirk St. Amant, Nathaniel A. Rivers, Clay Spinuzzi, Jean Goodwin and V. Svoboda and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Journal of Medical Internet Research.

In The Last Decade

S. Scott Graham

49 papers receiving 523 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
S. Scott Graham United States 15 149 103 81 76 63 56 576
Henk Pander Maat Netherlands 15 71 0.5× 93 0.9× 187 2.3× 37 0.5× 117 1.9× 47 651
María E. Len‐Ríos United States 17 418 2.8× 128 1.2× 91 1.1× 58 0.8× 33 0.5× 43 924
Scott Donaldson United States 14 175 1.2× 161 1.6× 57 0.7× 12 0.2× 31 0.5× 87 653
Michael Robertson Australia 15 189 1.3× 30 0.3× 106 1.3× 64 0.8× 37 0.6× 90 895
Gavin Brookes United Kingdom 16 147 1.0× 120 1.2× 89 1.1× 15 0.2× 92 1.5× 65 669
Maurizio Gotti Italy 17 77 0.5× 378 3.7× 81 1.0× 55 0.7× 83 1.3× 90 885
Svenja Adolphs United Kingdom 17 133 0.9× 334 3.2× 102 1.3× 31 0.4× 200 3.2× 54 1.1k
Rachel Young United States 17 400 2.7× 76 0.7× 89 1.1× 17 0.2× 77 1.2× 44 757
Joan Richardson Australia 14 105 0.7× 106 1.0× 23 0.3× 41 0.5× 25 0.4× 104 766
Huiling Ding United States 12 157 1.1× 132 1.3× 27 0.3× 44 0.6× 27 0.4× 30 451

Countries citing papers authored by S. Scott Graham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S. Scott Graham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. Scott Graham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. Scott Graham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S. Scott Graham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. Scott Graham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. Scott Graham. The network helps show where S. Scott Graham may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of S. Scott Graham

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S. Scott Graham. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S. Scott Graham based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with S. Scott Graham. S. Scott Graham is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Katz, Ruth, S. Scott Graham, & Daniel Z. Buchman. (2025). The need for epistemic humility in AI-assisted pain assessment. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy. 28(2). 339–349. 1 indexed citations
2.
Graham, S. Scott, Quinn Grundy, Joshua Edward, et al.. (2025). Research on policy mechanisms to address funding bias and conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a scoping review. PubMed. 10(1). 6–6. 1 indexed citations
3.
Graham, S. Scott, et al.. (2024). Rhetoric of/with AI: An Introduction. Rhetoric Society Quarterly. 54(3). 222–231. 3 indexed citations
5.
Graham, S. Scott, et al.. (2024). COVID-19 public health restrictions and opioid overdoes: a summative content analysis of emergency medical services records in three Texas counties. Substance Abuse Treatment Prevention and Policy. 19(1). 45–45.
6.
Amjad, Maaz, et al.. (2024). AI and Big Data approaches to addressing the opioid crisis: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open. 14(8). e084728–e084728.
7.
Graham, S. Scott, et al.. (2024). An interpretable machine learning framework for opioid overdose surveillance from emergency medical services records. PLoS ONE. 19(1). e0292170–e0292170. 3 indexed citations
8.
Graham, S. Scott, et al.. (2024). Sample Size Considerations for Fine-Tuning Large Language Models for Named Entity Recognition Tasks: Methodological Study. PubMed. 3. e52095–e52095. 14 indexed citations
9.
Graham, S. Scott, et al.. (2024). Beyond bias: Aggregate approaches to conflicts of interest research and policy in biomedical research. World Medical & Health Policy. 16(3). 489–505. 1 indexed citations
10.
Graham, S. Scott, et al.. (2024). Relational Work Is the Work: Virtual Healthcare Transformation for Rural, Remote and First Nations Communities in British Columbia. A Nudge Too Far? A Nudge at All? On Paying People to Be Healthy. 21(4). 28–37. 1 indexed citations
11.
Graham, S. Scott. (2024). Cadaverous Rhetorics and Affective Regulation at the Anatomical Museum. Rhetoric Society Quarterly. 54(2). 155–171.
12.
Graham, S. Scott, et al.. (2022). Opioid use stigmatization and destigmatization in health professional social media. Addiction Research & Theory. 30(5). 375–381. 4 indexed citations
13.
Graham, S. Scott, et al.. (2022). Evidence for stratified conflicts of interest policies in research contexts: a methodological review. BMJ Open. 12(9). e063501–e063501. 6 indexed citations
14.
Woollard, Robert, et al.. (2021). Addressing rural and Indigenous health inequities in Canada through socially accountable health partnerships. BMJ Open. 11(11). e048053–e048053. 24 indexed citations
15.
Graham, S. Scott, et al.. (2021). A dashboard for exploring clinical trials sponsorship and potential virtual monopolies. JAMIA Open. 4(4). ooab089–ooab089. 1 indexed citations
16.
Graham, S. Scott, et al.. (2020). Relationships among commercial practices and author conflicts of interest in biomedical publishing. PLoS ONE. 15(7). e0236166–e0236166. 11 indexed citations
17.
Graham, S. Scott. (2018). The Promise and Peril of Scientific Science Studies. Theory & Event. 21(2). 529–538. 2 indexed citations
18.
Rivers, Nathaniel A., et al.. (2015). Thinking with Bruno Latour in Rhetoric and Composition. 24 indexed citations
19.
Graham, S. Scott, et al.. (2014). Public Voices in Pharmaceutical Deliberations: Negotiating “Clinical Benefit” in the FDA’s Avastin Hearing. Journal of Medical Humanities. 35(2). 149–170. 23 indexed citations
20.
Graham, S. Scott. (2011). Dis-ease or Disease? Ontological Rarefaction in the Medical-Industrial Complex. Journal of Medical Humanities. 32(3). 167–186. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026